TY - JOUR
T1 - Genome-Wide Association Study of Pelvic Organ Prolapse Using the Michigan Genomics Initiative
AU - Cox, Caroline K.
AU - Pandit, Anita
AU - Zawistowski, Matthew
AU - Dutta, Diptavo
AU - Narla, Goutham
AU - Swenson, Carolyn W.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© American Urogynecologic Society. All rights reserved.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Objectives The aim of this study was to (1) replicate previously identified genetic variants significantly associated with pelvic organ prolapse and (2) identify new genetic variants associated with pelvic organ prolapse using a genome-wide association study. Methods Using our institution's database linking genetic and clinical data, we identified 1,329 women of European ancestry with an International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9)/ICD-10 code for prolapse, 767 of whom also had Current Procedural Terminology (CPT)/ICD-9/ICD-10 procedure codes for prolapse surgery, and 16,383 women of European ancestry older than 40 years without a prolapse diagnosis code as controls. Patients were genotyped using the Illumina HumanCoreExome chip and imputed to the Haplotype Reference Consortium. We tested 20 million single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) for association with pelvic organ prolapse adjusting for relatedness, age, chip version, and 4 principal components. We compared our results with 18 previously identified genome-wide significant SNPs from the UK Biobank, Commun Biol (2020;3:129), and Obstet Gynecol (2011;118:1345-1353). Results No variants achieved genome-wide significance (P = 5 × 10-8). However, we replicated 4 SNPs with biologic plausibility at nominal significance (P ≤ 0.05): rs12325192 (P = 0.002), rs9306894 (P = 0.05), rs1920568 (P = 0.034), and rs1247943 (P = 0.041), which were all intergenic and nearest the genes SALL1, GDF7, TBX5, and TBX5, respectively. Conclusions Our replication of 4 biologically plausible previously reported SNPs provides further evidence for a genetic contribution to prolapse, specifically that rs12325192, rs9306894, rs1920568, and rs1247943 may contribute to susceptibility for prolapse. These and previously reported associations that have not yet been replicated should be further explored in larger, more diverse cohorts, perhaps through meta-analysis.
AB - Objectives The aim of this study was to (1) replicate previously identified genetic variants significantly associated with pelvic organ prolapse and (2) identify new genetic variants associated with pelvic organ prolapse using a genome-wide association study. Methods Using our institution's database linking genetic and clinical data, we identified 1,329 women of European ancestry with an International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9)/ICD-10 code for prolapse, 767 of whom also had Current Procedural Terminology (CPT)/ICD-9/ICD-10 procedure codes for prolapse surgery, and 16,383 women of European ancestry older than 40 years without a prolapse diagnosis code as controls. Patients were genotyped using the Illumina HumanCoreExome chip and imputed to the Haplotype Reference Consortium. We tested 20 million single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) for association with pelvic organ prolapse adjusting for relatedness, age, chip version, and 4 principal components. We compared our results with 18 previously identified genome-wide significant SNPs from the UK Biobank, Commun Biol (2020;3:129), and Obstet Gynecol (2011;118:1345-1353). Results No variants achieved genome-wide significance (P = 5 × 10-8). However, we replicated 4 SNPs with biologic plausibility at nominal significance (P ≤ 0.05): rs12325192 (P = 0.002), rs9306894 (P = 0.05), rs1920568 (P = 0.034), and rs1247943 (P = 0.041), which were all intergenic and nearest the genes SALL1, GDF7, TBX5, and TBX5, respectively. Conclusions Our replication of 4 biologically plausible previously reported SNPs provides further evidence for a genetic contribution to prolapse, specifically that rs12325192, rs9306894, rs1920568, and rs1247943 may contribute to susceptibility for prolapse. These and previously reported associations that have not yet been replicated should be further explored in larger, more diverse cohorts, perhaps through meta-analysis.
KW - GWAS
KW - genetics
KW - genome-wide association study
KW - pelvic organ prolapse
KW - prolapse
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85112271017&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/SPV.0000000000001075
DO - 10.1097/SPV.0000000000001075
M3 - Article
C2 - 34027909
AN - SCOPUS:85112271017
SN - 2151-8378
VL - 27
SP - 502
EP - 506
JO - Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery
JF - Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery
IS - 8
ER -