TY - JOUR
T1 - Genetic perturbations that impair functional trait interactions lead to reduced bone strength and increased fragility in mice
AU - Smith, Lauren M.
AU - Bigelow, Erin M.R.
AU - Nolan, Bonnie T.
AU - Faillace, Meghan E.
AU - Nadeau, Joseph H.
AU - Jepsen, Karl J.
N1 - Funding Information:
Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Institutes of Health under award numbers AR44927 and S10RR026336 to KJJ and RR12305 to JHN. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. We thank Dr. Stephen Schlecht and Melissa Ramcharan for their assistance in data collection.
PY - 2014/10
Y1 - 2014/10
N2 - Functional adaptation may complicate the choice of phenotype used in genetic studies that seek to identify genes contributing to fracture susceptibility. Often, genetic variants affecting one trait are compensated by coordinated changes in other traits. Bone fracture is a prototypic example because mechanical function of long bones (stiffness and strength) depends on how the system coordinately adjusts the amount (cortical area) and quality (tissue-mineral density, TMD) of bone tissue to mechanically offset the natural variation in bone robustness (total area/length). We propose that efforts aimed at identifying genes regulating fracture resistance will benefit from better understanding how functional adaptation contributes to the genotype-phenotype relationship. We analyzed the femurs of C57BL/6J-ChrA/J/NaJ Chromosome Substitution Strains (CSSs) to systemically interrogate the mouse genome for chromosomes harboring genes that regulate mechanical function. These CSSs (CSS-i, i=the substituted chromosome) showed changes in mechanical function on the order of -26.6 to +11.5% relative to the B6 reference strain after adjusting for body size. Seven substitutions showed altered robustness, cortical area, or TMD, but no effect on mechanical function (CSS-4, 5, 8, 9, 17, 18, 19); six substitutions showed altered robustness, cortical area, or TMD, and reduced mechanical function (CSS-1, 2, 6, 10, 12, 15); and one substitution also showed reduced mechanical function but exhibited no significant changes in the three physical traits analyzed in this study (CSS-3). A key feature that distinguished CSSs that maintained function from those with reduced function was whether the system adjusted cortical area and TMD to the levels needed to compensate for the natural variation in bone robustness. These results provide a novel biomechanical mechanism linking genotype with phenotype, indicating that genes control function not only by regulating individual traits, but also by regulating how the system coordinately adjusts multiple traits to establish function.
AB - Functional adaptation may complicate the choice of phenotype used in genetic studies that seek to identify genes contributing to fracture susceptibility. Often, genetic variants affecting one trait are compensated by coordinated changes in other traits. Bone fracture is a prototypic example because mechanical function of long bones (stiffness and strength) depends on how the system coordinately adjusts the amount (cortical area) and quality (tissue-mineral density, TMD) of bone tissue to mechanically offset the natural variation in bone robustness (total area/length). We propose that efforts aimed at identifying genes regulating fracture resistance will benefit from better understanding how functional adaptation contributes to the genotype-phenotype relationship. We analyzed the femurs of C57BL/6J-ChrA/J/NaJ Chromosome Substitution Strains (CSSs) to systemically interrogate the mouse genome for chromosomes harboring genes that regulate mechanical function. These CSSs (CSS-i, i=the substituted chromosome) showed changes in mechanical function on the order of -26.6 to +11.5% relative to the B6 reference strain after adjusting for body size. Seven substitutions showed altered robustness, cortical area, or TMD, but no effect on mechanical function (CSS-4, 5, 8, 9, 17, 18, 19); six substitutions showed altered robustness, cortical area, or TMD, and reduced mechanical function (CSS-1, 2, 6, 10, 12, 15); and one substitution also showed reduced mechanical function but exhibited no significant changes in the three physical traits analyzed in this study (CSS-3). A key feature that distinguished CSSs that maintained function from those with reduced function was whether the system adjusted cortical area and TMD to the levels needed to compensate for the natural variation in bone robustness. These results provide a novel biomechanical mechanism linking genotype with phenotype, indicating that genes control function not only by regulating individual traits, but also by regulating how the system coordinately adjusts multiple traits to establish function.
KW - Bone
KW - Complex adaptive system
KW - Functional adaptation
KW - Genetic heterogeneity
KW - Homeostasis
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84904470625
U2 - 10.1016/j.bone.2014.06.035
DO - 10.1016/j.bone.2014.06.035
M3 - Article
C2 - 25003813
AN - SCOPUS:84904470625
SN - 8756-3282
VL - 67
SP - 130
EP - 138
JO - Bone
JF - Bone
ER -