TY - JOUR
T1 - Gastric distension and gastric capacity in relation to food intake in humans
AU - Geliebter, Allan
N1 - Funding Information:
1The author is indebted to Sandra Westreich for technical ass/stance. ~Fhe study was sup'ported in part by The St. Luke's-Roosevelt Institute for Health Sciences. aRequests for reprints should be addressed to Dr. Allan Geliebter, St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital, WH-10, Amsterdam Ave. and 114th St., New York, NY 10025.
PY - 1988
Y1 - 1988
N2 - Two studies were performed in the same subjects to explore the relationship between stomach capacity and food intake. In the first study, a balloon was passed orally into the stomach of four lean and four obese subjects before they ingested a liquid lunch meal. The balloon was filled with 0, 200, 400, 600, and 800 ml of water in a random sequence on different days. The balloon was kept inflated during ingestion then deflated and removed. Food intake was significantly reduced (p<0.01) by a balloon volume of ≥400 ml. In the second study, another balloon was inserted into the stomach of these subjects to estimate stomach capacity. The balloon was gradually filled at the rate of 100 ml/min with 30 sec pauses. The subjects rated their discomfort as 1 to 10, from no discomfort to extreme discomfort. A rating of 10 was the main index for stomach capacity. Mean capacity (ml) for the lean subjects was 1100±185 (SE) and for the obese 1925±175 (SE), t=3.24, p<0.02. When stomach capacity from the second study was correlated to spontaneous food intake at 0 balloon volume from the first study, r=.44, n.s. However, the relationship between stomach capacity and the balloon volume needed to suppress 50% of spontaneous intake was significant, r=.66, p<0.05. This may have implications for treatment of obesity with a gastric balloon.
AB - Two studies were performed in the same subjects to explore the relationship between stomach capacity and food intake. In the first study, a balloon was passed orally into the stomach of four lean and four obese subjects before they ingested a liquid lunch meal. The balloon was filled with 0, 200, 400, 600, and 800 ml of water in a random sequence on different days. The balloon was kept inflated during ingestion then deflated and removed. Food intake was significantly reduced (p<0.01) by a balloon volume of ≥400 ml. In the second study, another balloon was inserted into the stomach of these subjects to estimate stomach capacity. The balloon was gradually filled at the rate of 100 ml/min with 30 sec pauses. The subjects rated their discomfort as 1 to 10, from no discomfort to extreme discomfort. A rating of 10 was the main index for stomach capacity. Mean capacity (ml) for the lean subjects was 1100±185 (SE) and for the obese 1925±175 (SE), t=3.24, p<0.02. When stomach capacity from the second study was correlated to spontaneous food intake at 0 balloon volume from the first study, r=.44, n.s. However, the relationship between stomach capacity and the balloon volume needed to suppress 50% of spontaneous intake was significant, r=.66, p<0.05. This may have implications for treatment of obesity with a gastric balloon.
KW - Appetite
KW - Food intake
KW - Obesity
KW - Obesity treatment
KW - Satiety
KW - Stomach capacity
KW - Stomach distension
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0024210769&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/0031-9384(88)90333-2
DO - 10.1016/0031-9384(88)90333-2
M3 - Article
C2 - 3237852
AN - SCOPUS:0024210769
SN - 0031-9384
VL - 44
SP - 665
EP - 668
JO - Physiology and Behavior
JF - Physiology and Behavior
IS - 4-5
ER -