Abstract
Background: The Medicare Hospice Benefit increasingly serves people dying with dementia. We sought to understand characteristics, hospice use patterns, and last-month-of-life care quality ratings among hospice enrollees with dementia coexisting with another terminal illness as compared to enrollees with a principal hospice diagnosis of dementia, and enrollees with no dementia. Methods: We conducted a pooled cross-sectional study among decedent Medicare beneficiaries age 70+ using longitudinal data from the National Health and Aging Trends Study (NHATS) (last interview before death; after-death proxy interview) linked to Medicare hospice claims (2011–2017). We used unadjusted and adjusted regression analyses to compare characteristics of hospice enrollees with coexisting dementia to two groups: (1) enrollees with a principal dementia diagnosis, and (2) enrollees with no dementia. Results: Among 1105 decedent hospice enrollees age 70+, 40% had coexisting dementia, 16% had a principal diagnosis of dementia, and 44% had no dementia. In adjusted analyses, enrollees with coexisting dementia had high rates of needing help with 3–6 activities of daily living, similar to enrollees with principal dementia (62% vs. 67%). Enrollees with coexisting dementia had high clinical needs, similar to those with no dementia, for example, 63% versus 61% had bothersome pain. Care quality was worse for enrollees with coexisting dementia versus principal dementia (e.g., 61% vs. 79% had anxiety/sadness managed) and similar to those with no dementia. Enrollees with coexisting dementia had similar hospice use patterns as those with principal diagnoses and higher rates of problematic use patterns compared to those with no dementia (e.g., 16% vs. 10% live disenrollment, p = 0.004). Conclusions: People with coexisting dementia have functional needs comparable to enrollees with principal diagnoses of dementia, and clinical needs comparable to enrollees with no dementia. Changes to hospice care models and policy may be needed to ensure appropriate dementia care.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 785-798 |
Number of pages | 14 |
Journal | Journal of the American Geriatrics Society |
Volume | 71 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Mar 2023 |
Keywords
- dementia
- end-of-life
- hospice
Access to Document
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Functional and clinical needs of older hospice enrollees with coexisting dementia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver
}
In: Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, Vol. 71, No. 3, 03.2023, p. 785-798.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
TY - JOUR
T1 - Functional and clinical needs of older hospice enrollees with coexisting dementia
AU - Harrison, Krista L.
AU - Cenzer, Irena
AU - Smith, Alexander K.
AU - Hunt, Lauren J.
AU - Kelley, Amy S.
AU - Aldridge, Melissa D.
AU - Covinsky, Kenneth E.
N1 - Funding Information: Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Institute On Aging of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number P30AG044281. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. No sponsor was involved in the design, methods, recruitment, data collection, analysis, or preparation of the paper. Funding Information: Research reported in this publication was supported by a supplement to the UCSF Claude D. Pepper Older Americans Independence Center funded by the National Institute On Aging (NIA) of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) under Award Number P30AG044281 (3P30AG044281‐08S1). Investigators' time was additionally supported in part by funding from the NIH/NIA grants P01AG066605 (all); K01AG059831 (KLH), R01AG0577513 (AKS); K24AG068312 (AKS), R01AG054540 (ASK), K24AG062785 (ASK), K07AG060270 (MDA), P30AG044281 (KC); NIH/National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR) R01NR018462 (MDA); K76AG074924 (LJH). Funding Information: Research reported in this publication was supported by a supplement to the UCSF Claude D. Pepper Older Americans Independence Center funded by the National Institute On Aging (NIA) of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) under Award Number P30AG044281 (3P30AG044281-08S1). Investigators' time was additionally supported in part by funding from the NIH/NIA grants P01AG066605 (all); K01AG059831 (KLH), R01AG0577513 (AKS); K24AG068312 (AKS), R01AG054540 (ASK), K24AG062785 (ASK), K07AG060270 (MDA), P30AG044281 (KC); NIH/National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR) R01NR018462 (MDA); K76AG074924 (LJH). Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Institute On Aging of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number P30AG044281. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. No sponsor was involved in the design, methods, recruitment, data collection, analysis, or preparation of the paper. We conducted a pooled cross-sectional study using longitudinal data from NHATS, an annual nationally representative survey of Medicare beneficiaries age 65+. NHATS enrolled new participants in 2011 and 2015 and reinterviews participants yearly. NHATS includes a last month of life survey completed by proxy respondents after the sample person dies. NHATS is conducted by the Johns Hopkins University and is sponsored by the National Institute on Aging (U01AG32947). The Institutional Review Board of the University of California, San Francisco approved this study. We conducted a pooled cross-sectional study using longitudinal data from NHATS, an annual nationally representative survey of Medicare beneficiaries age 65+. NHATS enrolled new participants in 2011 and 2015 and reinterviews participants yearly. NHATS includes a last month of life survey completed by proxy respondents after the sample person dies. NHATS is conducted by the Johns Hopkins University and is sponsored by the National Institute on Aging (U01AG32947). The Institutional Review Board of the University of California, San Francisco approved this study. Our study sample included decedents who enrolled in NHATS in 2011 or 2015 at age 70+ and used hospice at the end of life (n = 1460). We only included decedents with date of death before the end of year 2017 because of claims data availability. We excluded those who did not have an NHATS sample interview prior to death (n = 355), resulting in a final sample of 1105 participants. Within the cohort of 1105 decedents, the percent of participants that died in each year ranged from 7% (2011, n = 78) to 18% (2016, n = 199). The principal hospice diagnosis is the reason, or indication, for hospice care, the disease that qualifies them for hospice care because they are likely to die from the disease in the following 6 months. To identify principal hospice diagnosis codes, we used the first hospice claim of the last hospice enrollment at least 1+ day before death. Medicare Advantage enrollees who enrolled in hospice had claims reported through the Medicare Hospice Benefit during the study years (2011–2017) and thus are captured in this sample. We examined principal hospice diagnoses for dementia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder (COPD), and heart failure. To identify principal hospice diagnoses of dementia in the hospice claims, we used ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes used in prior claims-based dementia research.14–17 For principal hospice diagnoses of COPD and heart failure we used codes from the Chronic Conditions Data Warehouse18; for principal diagnoses of cancer, we used ICD-9 and ICD-10 chapters (Supplementary Text S1). To identify coexisting dementia status (e.g., not listed on hospice claims), we used the NHATS interview prior to death completed by the sample person or proxy. We used the validated NHATS algorithm for “probable dementia” based on physician diagnosis, proxy-rated score for the Ascertain Dementia 8 screen, or impairment in memory, orientation, or executive function in cognitive exams.19 We defined coexisting dementia as the decedents who had a non-dementia principal hospice diagnosis yet probable dementia in NHATS. Among hospice decedents with principal diagnosis and coexisting dementia, we examined awareness of dementia. We assessed prevalence of persons reporting that a “doctor told you that you had dementia” in any round of NHATS. For sample persons with proxy respondents, we assessed prevalence of proxy reporting “dementia” as the reason for the proxy respondent. To understand needs prior to or around the time of hospice admission, we drew demographic, social, functional, clinical, and behavioral characteristics reported by sample person or proxy in the last NHATS sample interview prior to death, which, in this study sample, was a median of 7 months (205 days, range 114–307) before death. Demographic characteristics included age and gender. Social characteristics included race/ethnicity, educational attainment, partnership status, annual income, receipt of Medicaid insurance, having a proxy respondent, and living alone. Functional characteristics included number of impairments in basic and instrumental activities of daily living, falls in the prior year, and bedboundness.20 Clinical characteristics included self-reported chronic conditions other than dementia, number and length of hospital stays in prior year, and symptoms. Behavioral characteristics (getting lost, not being able to be left alone, and hallucinations) were collected only for sample persons with proxy respondents. We used the NHATS last month of life survey to examine hours of informal caregiver help and location of death. Location of hospice entry was defined using hospice claims. For outcome measures, we characterized hospice use patterns from claims data, including hospice enrollment of less than/equal to 3 days, hospice enrollment longer than 6 months, live disenrollment from hospice, and live hospice disenrollment after 6 months of hospice. We used NHATS measures of quality of care in the last month of life (n = 1055) with dichotomizations based on our prior work.21 Measures included overall care rating; management of pain, breathlessness, sadness/anxiety, personal care needs; providing spiritual support, goal consistent care; treating patient with respect, making decisions with family input, keeping family informed, and coordinating care. We compared hospice enrollees with coexisting dementia to two groups; (1) those with a principal hospice diagnosis of dementia, and (2) enrollees with no dementia (with neither a principal diagnosis of dementia nor coexisting dementia). We first examined differences in demographic, social, functional, and clinical characteristics using age- and gender-adjusted logistic regressions to estimate the prevalence of binary characteristics in each enrollee category. Similarly, we used age- and gender-adjusted quantile regressions to determine the median and interquartile range (IQR) of caregiver hours in the last month in each enrollee category. We used age- and gender- adjusted Poisson regression to estimate mean of number of nights spent in a hospital in the last year. Second, we examined differences in hospice use patterns and assessments of last-month-of-life care using chi-square tests for unadjusted analyses and logistic regression accounting for age, gender, year of death, hospice entry location, number of comorbidities, and census region. After performing regression analyses, we used post-estimation commands to estimate the adjusted predicted probabilities for each outcome measure. Analysis was conducted using SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Inc) and Stata version 17.0 (StataCorp LLC). All analyses account for the NHATS survey weights. Publisher Copyright: © 2022 The American Geriatrics Society.
PY - 2023/3
Y1 - 2023/3
N2 - Background: The Medicare Hospice Benefit increasingly serves people dying with dementia. We sought to understand characteristics, hospice use patterns, and last-month-of-life care quality ratings among hospice enrollees with dementia coexisting with another terminal illness as compared to enrollees with a principal hospice diagnosis of dementia, and enrollees with no dementia. Methods: We conducted a pooled cross-sectional study among decedent Medicare beneficiaries age 70+ using longitudinal data from the National Health and Aging Trends Study (NHATS) (last interview before death; after-death proxy interview) linked to Medicare hospice claims (2011–2017). We used unadjusted and adjusted regression analyses to compare characteristics of hospice enrollees with coexisting dementia to two groups: (1) enrollees with a principal dementia diagnosis, and (2) enrollees with no dementia. Results: Among 1105 decedent hospice enrollees age 70+, 40% had coexisting dementia, 16% had a principal diagnosis of dementia, and 44% had no dementia. In adjusted analyses, enrollees with coexisting dementia had high rates of needing help with 3–6 activities of daily living, similar to enrollees with principal dementia (62% vs. 67%). Enrollees with coexisting dementia had high clinical needs, similar to those with no dementia, for example, 63% versus 61% had bothersome pain. Care quality was worse for enrollees with coexisting dementia versus principal dementia (e.g., 61% vs. 79% had anxiety/sadness managed) and similar to those with no dementia. Enrollees with coexisting dementia had similar hospice use patterns as those with principal diagnoses and higher rates of problematic use patterns compared to those with no dementia (e.g., 16% vs. 10% live disenrollment, p = 0.004). Conclusions: People with coexisting dementia have functional needs comparable to enrollees with principal diagnoses of dementia, and clinical needs comparable to enrollees with no dementia. Changes to hospice care models and policy may be needed to ensure appropriate dementia care.
AB - Background: The Medicare Hospice Benefit increasingly serves people dying with dementia. We sought to understand characteristics, hospice use patterns, and last-month-of-life care quality ratings among hospice enrollees with dementia coexisting with another terminal illness as compared to enrollees with a principal hospice diagnosis of dementia, and enrollees with no dementia. Methods: We conducted a pooled cross-sectional study among decedent Medicare beneficiaries age 70+ using longitudinal data from the National Health and Aging Trends Study (NHATS) (last interview before death; after-death proxy interview) linked to Medicare hospice claims (2011–2017). We used unadjusted and adjusted regression analyses to compare characteristics of hospice enrollees with coexisting dementia to two groups: (1) enrollees with a principal dementia diagnosis, and (2) enrollees with no dementia. Results: Among 1105 decedent hospice enrollees age 70+, 40% had coexisting dementia, 16% had a principal diagnosis of dementia, and 44% had no dementia. In adjusted analyses, enrollees with coexisting dementia had high rates of needing help with 3–6 activities of daily living, similar to enrollees with principal dementia (62% vs. 67%). Enrollees with coexisting dementia had high clinical needs, similar to those with no dementia, for example, 63% versus 61% had bothersome pain. Care quality was worse for enrollees with coexisting dementia versus principal dementia (e.g., 61% vs. 79% had anxiety/sadness managed) and similar to those with no dementia. Enrollees with coexisting dementia had similar hospice use patterns as those with principal diagnoses and higher rates of problematic use patterns compared to those with no dementia (e.g., 16% vs. 10% live disenrollment, p = 0.004). Conclusions: People with coexisting dementia have functional needs comparable to enrollees with principal diagnoses of dementia, and clinical needs comparable to enrollees with no dementia. Changes to hospice care models and policy may be needed to ensure appropriate dementia care.
KW - dementia
KW - end-of-life
KW - hospice
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85142647216&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/jgs.18130
DO - 10.1111/jgs.18130
M3 - Article
C2 - 36420734
AN - SCOPUS:85142647216
SN - 0002-8614
VL - 71
SP - 785
EP - 798
JO - Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
JF - Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
IS - 3
ER -