French version of the brief infant-toddler social and emotional assessment questionnaire-bitsea

Jaqueline Wendland; Marie Danet; Estelle Gacoin; Nadia Didane; Nicolas Bodeau; Thomas Saïas; Morgane Le Bail; Marie Thérèse Cazenave; Thais Molina; Ophélie Puccinelli; Olivia Chirac; Melania Medeiros; Priscille Gérardin; David Cohen; Antoine Guédeney

doi:10.1093/jpepsy/jsu016

French version of the brief infant-toddler social and emotional assessment questionnaire-bitsea

Jaqueline Wendland, Marie Danet, Estelle Gacoin, Nadia Didane, Nicolas Bodeau, Thomas Saïas, Morgane Le Bail, Marie Thérèse Cazenave, Thais Molina, Ophélie Puccinelli, Olivia Chirac, Melania Medeiros, Priscille Gérardin, David Cohen, Antoine Guédeney

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

18 Scopus citations

Abstract

ObjectiveThe aim of the present study was to examine the psychometric properties of the French version of the Brief Infant-Toddler Social and Emotional Assessment (BITSEA). Methods The sample consisted of 589 low-risk infants aged 12-36 months and their parents. Parents completed the BITSEA, the Child Behavior Checklist 11/2-5 (CBCL - 18 months to 5 years version), and the Parenting Stress Index - Short Form (PSI-SF).Results Multitrait-multimethod and confirmatory factor analyses revealed adequate psychometric properties for the French version of the BITSEA. Scores on the BITSEA Problem scale were positively correlated to all CBCL and PSI-SF subscales, whereas negative correlations were found between BITSEA Competence scale and CBCL and PSI-SF subscales. The BITSEA Problem score significantly increased with level of parental worry, examined through a single-item question that is part of the BITSEA. Conclusion Findings support the validity of the French version of the BITSEA. However, additional work on the clinical validity of the BITSEA, including with at-risk children, is warranted.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	562-575
Number of pages	14
Journal	Journal of Pediatric Psychology
Volume	39
Issue number	5
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jsu016
State	Published - Jun 2014
Externally published	Yes

Keywords

infant
parent
screening
social-emotional development
toddler
validity

Access to Document

10.1093/jpepsy/jsu016

Cite this

Wendland, J., Danet, M., Gacoin, E., Didane, N., Bodeau, N., Saïas, T., Le Bail, M., Cazenave, M. T., Molina, T., Puccinelli, O., Chirac, O., Medeiros, M., Gérardin, P., Cohen, D., & Guédeney, A. (2014). French version of the brief infant-toddler social and emotional assessment questionnaire-bitsea. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 39(5), 562-575. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jsu016

@article{aa45bcc8a67f4188addd797c686258b1,

title = "French version of the brief infant-toddler social and emotional assessment questionnaire-bitsea",

abstract = "ObjectiveThe aim of the present study was to examine the psychometric properties of the French version of the Brief Infant-Toddler Social and Emotional Assessment (BITSEA). Methods The sample consisted of 589 low-risk infants aged 12-36 months and their parents. Parents completed the BITSEA, the Child Behavior Checklist 11/2-5 (CBCL - 18 months to 5 years version), and the Parenting Stress Index - Short Form (PSI-SF).Results Multitrait-multimethod and confirmatory factor analyses revealed adequate psychometric properties for the French version of the BITSEA. Scores on the BITSEA Problem scale were positively correlated to all CBCL and PSI-SF subscales, whereas negative correlations were found between BITSEA Competence scale and CBCL and PSI-SF subscales. The BITSEA Problem score significantly increased with level of parental worry, examined through a single-item question that is part of the BITSEA. Conclusion Findings support the validity of the French version of the BITSEA. However, additional work on the clinical validity of the BITSEA, including with at-risk children, is warranted.",

keywords = "infant, parent, screening, social-emotional development, toddler, validity",

author = "Jaqueline Wendland and Marie Danet and Estelle Gacoin and Nadia Didane and Nicolas Bodeau and Thomas Sa{\"i}as and {Le Bail}, Morgane and Cazenave, {Marie Th{\'e}r{\`e}se} and Thais Molina and Oph{\'e}lie Puccinelli and Olivia Chirac and Melania Medeiros and Priscille G{\'e}rardin and David Cohen and Antoine Gu{\'e}deney",

year = "2014",

month = jun,

doi = "10.1093/jpepsy/jsu016",

language = "English",

volume = "39",

pages = "562--575",

journal = "Journal of Pediatric Psychology",

issn = "0146-8693",

publisher = "Oxford University Press",

number = "5",

}

Wendland, J, Danet, M, Gacoin, E, Didane, N, Bodeau, N, Saïas, T, Le Bail, M, Cazenave, MT, Molina, T, Puccinelli, O, Chirac, O, Medeiros, M, Gérardin, P, Cohen, D & Guédeney, A 2014, 'French version of the brief infant-toddler social and emotional assessment questionnaire-bitsea', Journal of Pediatric Psychology, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 562-575. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jsu016

TY - JOUR

T1 - French version of the brief infant-toddler social and emotional assessment questionnaire-bitsea

AU - Wendland, Jaqueline

AU - Danet, Marie

AU - Gacoin, Estelle

AU - Didane, Nadia

AU - Bodeau, Nicolas

AU - Saïas, Thomas

AU - Le Bail, Morgane

AU - Cazenave, Marie Thérèse

AU - Molina, Thais

AU - Puccinelli, Ophélie

AU - Chirac, Olivia

AU - Medeiros, Melania

AU - Gérardin, Priscille

AU - Cohen, David

AU - Guédeney, Antoine

PY - 2014/6

Y1 - 2014/6

N2 - ObjectiveThe aim of the present study was to examine the psychometric properties of the French version of the Brief Infant-Toddler Social and Emotional Assessment (BITSEA). Methods The sample consisted of 589 low-risk infants aged 12-36 months and their parents. Parents completed the BITSEA, the Child Behavior Checklist 11/2-5 (CBCL - 18 months to 5 years version), and the Parenting Stress Index - Short Form (PSI-SF).Results Multitrait-multimethod and confirmatory factor analyses revealed adequate psychometric properties for the French version of the BITSEA. Scores on the BITSEA Problem scale were positively correlated to all CBCL and PSI-SF subscales, whereas negative correlations were found between BITSEA Competence scale and CBCL and PSI-SF subscales. The BITSEA Problem score significantly increased with level of parental worry, examined through a single-item question that is part of the BITSEA. Conclusion Findings support the validity of the French version of the BITSEA. However, additional work on the clinical validity of the BITSEA, including with at-risk children, is warranted.

AB - ObjectiveThe aim of the present study was to examine the psychometric properties of the French version of the Brief Infant-Toddler Social and Emotional Assessment (BITSEA). Methods The sample consisted of 589 low-risk infants aged 12-36 months and their parents. Parents completed the BITSEA, the Child Behavior Checklist 11/2-5 (CBCL - 18 months to 5 years version), and the Parenting Stress Index - Short Form (PSI-SF).Results Multitrait-multimethod and confirmatory factor analyses revealed adequate psychometric properties for the French version of the BITSEA. Scores on the BITSEA Problem scale were positively correlated to all CBCL and PSI-SF subscales, whereas negative correlations were found between BITSEA Competence scale and CBCL and PSI-SF subscales. The BITSEA Problem score significantly increased with level of parental worry, examined through a single-item question that is part of the BITSEA. Conclusion Findings support the validity of the French version of the BITSEA. However, additional work on the clinical validity of the BITSEA, including with at-risk children, is warranted.

KW - infant

KW - parent

KW - screening

KW - social-emotional development

KW - toddler

KW - validity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84901440738&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/jpepsy/jsu016

DO - 10.1093/jpepsy/jsu016

M3 - Article

C2 - 24719240

AN - SCOPUS:84901440738

SN - 0146-8693

VL - 39

SP - 562

EP - 575

JO - Journal of Pediatric Psychology

JF - Journal of Pediatric Psychology

IS - 5

ER -

French version of the brief infant-toddler social and emotional assessment questionnaire-bitsea

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this