TY - JOUR
T1 - Freeze-only versus fresh embryo transfer in a multicenter matched cohort study
T2 - contribution of progesterone and maternal age to success rates
AU - Wang, Ange
AU - Santistevan, Anthony
AU - Hunter Cohn, Karen
AU - Copperman, Alan
AU - Nulsen, John
AU - Miller, Brad T.
AU - Widra, Eric
AU - Westphal, Lynn M.
AU - Yurttas Beim, Piraye
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 American Society for Reproductive Medicine
PY - 2017/8
Y1 - 2017/8
N2 - Objective To compare implantation and ongoing pregnancy rates in freeze-only versus fresh transfer cycles. Design Retrospective matched cohort study. Setting Not applicable. Patient(s) Women selected using a matching algorithm for similar distributions of clinical characteristics for a total of 2,910 cycles (1,455 fresh cohort and 1,455 freeze-only cohort). Intervention(s) None. Main Outcome Measure(s) Implantation and ongoing pregnancy rates. Result(s) Implantation and ongoing pregnancy rates were statistically significantly higher in the freeze-only transfer cohort than in the matched fresh transfer cohort: ongoing pregnancy rate for freeze-only was 52.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 49.4–54.6) and for fresh was 45.3% (95% CI, 42.7–47.9), odds ratio (OR) 1.31 (95% CI, 1.13–1.51). In a stratified analysis, the odds of ongoing pregnancy after freeze-only transfer were statistically significantly higher for women both above and below age 35 with progesterone concentration >1.0 ng/mL (age ≤35: OR 1.38 [1.11–1.71]; age >35: OR 1.73 [1.34–2.24]). For women with progesterone concentration ≤1.0 ng/mL, no statistically significant difference in freeze-only odds of ongoing pregnancy was observed in either age group. The sensitivity analysis revealed that increasing maternal age alone (regardless of progesterone) trended toward a more beneficial effect of freeze-only cycles. A lower progesterone concentration was associated with statistically significantly higher ongoing pregnancy odds for fresh but not freeze-only cycles. Conclusion(s) Freeze-only transfer protocols are associated with statistically significantly higher ongoing implantation and pregnancy rates compared with fresh transfer cycles. This effect is most pronounced for cycles with progesterone >1.0 ng/mL at trigger and may also be stronger for older patients.
AB - Objective To compare implantation and ongoing pregnancy rates in freeze-only versus fresh transfer cycles. Design Retrospective matched cohort study. Setting Not applicable. Patient(s) Women selected using a matching algorithm for similar distributions of clinical characteristics for a total of 2,910 cycles (1,455 fresh cohort and 1,455 freeze-only cohort). Intervention(s) None. Main Outcome Measure(s) Implantation and ongoing pregnancy rates. Result(s) Implantation and ongoing pregnancy rates were statistically significantly higher in the freeze-only transfer cohort than in the matched fresh transfer cohort: ongoing pregnancy rate for freeze-only was 52.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 49.4–54.6) and for fresh was 45.3% (95% CI, 42.7–47.9), odds ratio (OR) 1.31 (95% CI, 1.13–1.51). In a stratified analysis, the odds of ongoing pregnancy after freeze-only transfer were statistically significantly higher for women both above and below age 35 with progesterone concentration >1.0 ng/mL (age ≤35: OR 1.38 [1.11–1.71]; age >35: OR 1.73 [1.34–2.24]). For women with progesterone concentration ≤1.0 ng/mL, no statistically significant difference in freeze-only odds of ongoing pregnancy was observed in either age group. The sensitivity analysis revealed that increasing maternal age alone (regardless of progesterone) trended toward a more beneficial effect of freeze-only cycles. A lower progesterone concentration was associated with statistically significantly higher ongoing pregnancy odds for fresh but not freeze-only cycles. Conclusion(s) Freeze-only transfer protocols are associated with statistically significantly higher ongoing implantation and pregnancy rates compared with fresh transfer cycles. This effect is most pronounced for cycles with progesterone >1.0 ng/mL at trigger and may also be stronger for older patients.
KW - Controlled ovarian stimulation
KW - cryopreservation
KW - freeze-only
KW - fresh transfer
KW - frozen embryo transfer
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85020137526&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.05.007
DO - 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.05.007
M3 - Article
C2 - 28579411
AN - SCOPUS:85020137526
SN - 0015-0282
VL - 108
SP - 254-261.e4
JO - Fertility and Sterility
JF - Fertility and Sterility
IS - 2
ER -