Forensic psychiatric experiences, stigma, and self-concept: a mixed-methods study

Michelle L. West, Abby L. Mulay, Joseph S. DeLuca, Keira O’Donovan, Philip T. Yanos

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

18 Scopus citations

Abstract

This study used a mixed-methods approach to investigate stigma experiences and self-concepts of individuals with both mental illness and criminal histories. The full sample of participants completed self-report measures of self-concept related to mental illness, race, and criminal history, and a brief qualitative self-concept measure. A subsample of participants completed semi-structured interviews, which were analyzed for content domains. Analyses suggested that several aspects of self-concept related to responses on stigma measures. Participants who identified their own styles of acting, feeling, and thinking tended to exhibit less mental illness self-stigma. Qualitative interview findings suggested that the majority of participants described stigma experiences related to mental illness, race, and criminal history, and these stigmatized identities negatively influenced one another. Conclusions review how stigmatized identities can intersect in powerful ways for individuals with mental illness and histories of criminal offending, and discuss implications for future research and clinical practice.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)574-596
Number of pages23
JournalJournal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology
Volume29
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 4 Jul 2018
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Self-concept
  • criminal history
  • mental illness
  • race
  • self-stigma

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Forensic psychiatric experiences, stigma, and self-concept: a mixed-methods study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this