TY - JOUR
T1 - Five-year outcomes after PCI or CABG for left main coronary disease
AU - EXCEL Trial Investigators
AU - Stone, Gregg W.
AU - Pieter Kappetein, A.
AU - Sabik, Joseph F.
AU - Pocock, Stuart J.
AU - Morice, Marie Claude
AU - Puskas, John
AU - Kandzari, David E.
AU - Karmpaliotis, Dimitri
AU - Morris Brown, W.
AU - Lembo, Nicholas J.
AU - Banning, Adrian
AU - Merkely, Béla
AU - Horkay, Ferenc
AU - Boonstra, Piet W.
AU - Van Boven, Ad J.
AU - Ungi, Imre
AU - Bogáts, Gabor
AU - Mansour, Samer
AU - Noiseux, Nicolas
AU - Sabaté, Manel
AU - Pomar, Jose
AU - Hickey, Mark
AU - Gershlick, Anthony
AU - Buszman, Pawel E.
AU - Bochenek, Andrzej
AU - Schampaert, Erick
AU - Pagé, Pierre
AU - Modolo, Rodrigo
AU - Gregson, John
AU - Simonton, Charles A.
AU - Mehran, Roxana
AU - Kosmidou, Ioanna
AU - Généreux, Philippe
AU - Crowley, Aaron
AU - Dressler, Ovidiu
AU - Serruys, Patrick W.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Massachusetts Medical Society.
PY - 2019/11/7
Y1 - 2019/11/7
N2 - BACKGROUND Long-term outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with contemporary drug-eluting stents, as compared with coronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG), in patients with left main coronary artery disease are not clearly established. METHODS We randomly assigned 1905 patients with left main coronary artery disease of low or intermediate anatomical complexity (according to assessment at the participating centers) to undergo either PCI with fluoropolymer-based cobalt-chromium everolimus-eluting stents (PCI group, 948 patients) or CABG (CABG group, 957 patients). The primary outcome was a composite of death, stroke, or myocardial infarction. RESULTS At 5 years, a primary outcome event had occurred in 22.0% of the patients in the PCI group and in 19.2% of the patients in the CABG group (difference, 2.8 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], −0.9 to 6.5; P=0.13). Death from any cause occurred more frequently in the PCI group than in the CABG group (in 13.0% vs. 9.9%; difference, 3.1 percentage points; 95% CI, 0.2 to 6.1). In the PCI and CABG groups, the incidences of definite cardiovascular death (5.0% and 4.5%, respectively; difference, 0.5 percentage points; 95% CI, −1.4 to 2.5) and myocardial infarction (10.6% and 9.1%; difference, 1.4 percentage points; 95% CI, −1.3 to 4.2) were not significantly different. All cerebrovascular events were less frequent after PCI than after CABG (3.3% vs. 5.2%; difference, −1.9 percentage points; 95% CI, −3.8 to 0), although the incidence of stroke was not significantly different between the two groups (2.9% and 3.7%; difference, −0.8 percentage points; 95% CI, −2.4 to 0.9). Ischemia-driven revascularization was more frequent after PCI than after CABG (16.9% vs. 10.0%; difference, 6.9 percentage points; 95% CI, 3.7 to 10.0). CONCLUSIONS In patients with left main coronary artery disease of low or intermediate anatomical complexity, there was no significant difference between PCI and CABG with respect to the rate of the composite outcome of death, stroke, or myocardial infarction at 5years.(FundedbyAbbottVascular;EXCELClinicalTrials.govnumber,NCT01205776).
AB - BACKGROUND Long-term outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with contemporary drug-eluting stents, as compared with coronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG), in patients with left main coronary artery disease are not clearly established. METHODS We randomly assigned 1905 patients with left main coronary artery disease of low or intermediate anatomical complexity (according to assessment at the participating centers) to undergo either PCI with fluoropolymer-based cobalt-chromium everolimus-eluting stents (PCI group, 948 patients) or CABG (CABG group, 957 patients). The primary outcome was a composite of death, stroke, or myocardial infarction. RESULTS At 5 years, a primary outcome event had occurred in 22.0% of the patients in the PCI group and in 19.2% of the patients in the CABG group (difference, 2.8 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], −0.9 to 6.5; P=0.13). Death from any cause occurred more frequently in the PCI group than in the CABG group (in 13.0% vs. 9.9%; difference, 3.1 percentage points; 95% CI, 0.2 to 6.1). In the PCI and CABG groups, the incidences of definite cardiovascular death (5.0% and 4.5%, respectively; difference, 0.5 percentage points; 95% CI, −1.4 to 2.5) and myocardial infarction (10.6% and 9.1%; difference, 1.4 percentage points; 95% CI, −1.3 to 4.2) were not significantly different. All cerebrovascular events were less frequent after PCI than after CABG (3.3% vs. 5.2%; difference, −1.9 percentage points; 95% CI, −3.8 to 0), although the incidence of stroke was not significantly different between the two groups (2.9% and 3.7%; difference, −0.8 percentage points; 95% CI, −2.4 to 0.9). Ischemia-driven revascularization was more frequent after PCI than after CABG (16.9% vs. 10.0%; difference, 6.9 percentage points; 95% CI, 3.7 to 10.0). CONCLUSIONS In patients with left main coronary artery disease of low or intermediate anatomical complexity, there was no significant difference between PCI and CABG with respect to the rate of the composite outcome of death, stroke, or myocardial infarction at 5years.(FundedbyAbbottVascular;EXCELClinicalTrials.govnumber,NCT01205776).
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85074674381&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1056/NEJMoa1909406
DO - 10.1056/NEJMoa1909406
M3 - Article
C2 - 31562798
AN - SCOPUS:85074674381
SN - 0028-4793
VL - 381
SP - 1820
EP - 1830
JO - New England Journal of Medicine
JF - New England Journal of Medicine
IS - 19
ER -