Fiscal impact of a potential legislative ban on second trimester elective terminations for prenatally diagnosed abnormalities

V. L. Miller, Scott B. Ransom, Melissa A. Ayoub, Eric L. Krivchenia, Mark I. Evans

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

This study was designed to determine the fiscal impact of a theoretical legislative ban on elective terminations for prenatally diagnosed abnormalities at Hutzel Hospital/Wayne State University. A fiscal comparison was completed for patients who had second trimester elective terminations for prenatally diagnosed abnormalities versus not allowing the procedure. An eight-year database of genetics cases and hospital and physician cost estimates for performing elective terminations for prenatally diagnosed abnormalities, and published reports of the average lifetime costs per selected birth defects, were used to calculate the net cost. The estimated lifetime cost for an average cohort year of a legislative ban on elective terminations for prenatally diagnosed abnormalities was found to be at least $8.5 million for patients treated at Hutzel Hospital. Extrapolated, a similar ban on second trimester elective terminations would have a net cost of $74 million in Michigan and $2 billion annually in the United States. 359-362 (C) 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)359-362
Number of pages4
JournalAmerican Journal of Medical Genetics
Volume91
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 24 Apr 2000
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Birth defects
  • Costs
  • Elective terminations
  • Legislative ban
  • Managed care
  • Prenatal diagnosis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Fiscal impact of a potential legislative ban on second trimester elective terminations for prenatally diagnosed abnormalities'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this