Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Features of automaticity in eating behavior

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

13 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective: Some authors (e.g. Cohen and Farley, 2008) have argued that control of eating behavior is difficult because this behavior could be an automatic one. Our objective was to test this claim in an experimental design. Method: Automaticity can be diagnosed by looking for the presence of its features in performance or processes. We designed an experiment to test the features of uncontrollability and unconsciousness. Results: Results showed that individuals' success in controlling their behavior does not depend on their goal or the instruction received (uncontrollability), although individuals believe their goals justify their behavior (unconsciousness). High scores on cognitive restraint were predictive for the success in control of eating behavior. Conclusion: Eating has features of automatic behavior, thus can be diagnosed as such. Our results bear important implications for the research and practice concerning eating behavior, especially obesity.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)46-48
Number of pages3
JournalEating Behaviors
Volume13
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2012

Keywords

  • Automaticity
  • Cognitive restraint
  • Control
  • Eating behavior
  • Obesity

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Features of automaticity in eating behavior'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this