FDG-PET in never-previously medicated psychotic adolescents treated with olanzapine or haloperidol

Monte S. Buchsbaum, M. Mehmet Haznedar, Jonathan Aronowitz, Adam M. Brickman, Randall E. Newmark, Rachel Bloom, Jesse Brand, Kim E. Goldstein, Desmond Heath, Meghan Starson, Erin A. Hazlett

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

32 Scopus citations


We acquired Positron emission tomography with 18-F-deoxyglucose (FDG-PET) and anatomical MRI in 30 never-previously medicated psychotic adolescents (ages 13-20). (FDG-PET) was obtained at baseline and after 8-9 weeks of a randomized double-blind trial of either olanzapine or haloperidol. Neuropsychological tests of executive function were also obtained. Patients carried out the serial verbal learning task, a modification of the California Verbal Learning Test, during the uptake of the FDG. PET scans were coregistered with spoiled gradient MRI (TR = 24, TE = 5, flip angle 40°, slice thickness 1.2 mm, field of view 230 mm) for accurate anatomical identification of regions of interest traced on the MRI. Twenty-two of the thirty patients completed the second PET and clinical evaluation. Individuals treated with olanzapine increased relative metabolic rates in the frontal lobe more than the occipital lobe while patients treated with haloperidol failed to increase frontal metabolic rates and did not show an anteroposterior gradient in medication response. Haloperidol increased striatal metabolic rate more than olanzapine. Both drugs increased thalamic metabolic rates and this increase was significantly larger in younger (age 13-15) than older (16-21) patients.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)293-305
Number of pages13
JournalSchizophrenia Research
Issue number1-3
StatePublished - Aug 2007


  • Early onset
  • Hypofrontality
  • Neuroleptic
  • Schizophrenia
  • Striatum
  • Thalamus


Dive into the research topics of 'FDG-PET in never-previously medicated psychotic adolescents treated with olanzapine or haloperidol'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this