TY - JOUR
T1 - Failure to Rescue
T2 - A Quality Metric for Cardiac Surgery and Cardiovascular Critical Care
AU - Gross, Caroline R.
AU - Adams, David H.
AU - Patel, Parth
AU - Varghese, Robin
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Canadian Cardiovascular Society
PY - 2023/4
Y1 - 2023/4
N2 - Failure to rescue, defined as mortality after a surgical complication, is a widely accepted quality metric across many specialties and is becoming an important metric in cardiac surgery. The failure to rescue metric provides a target for improvements in patient outcomes after complications occur. To be used appropriately, the failure to rescue metric must be defined using a prespecified set of life-threatening and rescuable complications. Successful patient rescue requires a systematic approach of complication recognition, timely escalation of care, effective medical management, and mitigation of additional complications. This process requires contributions from cardiac surgeons, intensivists, and other specialists including cardiologists, neurologists, and anaesthesiologists. Factors that affect failure to rescue rates in cardiac surgery and cardiovascular critical care include nurse staffing ratios, intensivist coverage, advanced specialist support, hospital and surgical volume, the presence of trainees, and patient comorbidities. Strategies to improve patient rescue include working to understand the mechanisms of failure to rescue, anticipating postoperative complications, prioritizing microsystem factors, enhancing early escalation of care, and educating and empowering junior clinicians. When used appropriately, the failure to rescue quality metric can help institutions focus on improving processes of care that minimize morbidity and mortality from rescuable complications after cardiac surgery.
AB - Failure to rescue, defined as mortality after a surgical complication, is a widely accepted quality metric across many specialties and is becoming an important metric in cardiac surgery. The failure to rescue metric provides a target for improvements in patient outcomes after complications occur. To be used appropriately, the failure to rescue metric must be defined using a prespecified set of life-threatening and rescuable complications. Successful patient rescue requires a systematic approach of complication recognition, timely escalation of care, effective medical management, and mitigation of additional complications. This process requires contributions from cardiac surgeons, intensivists, and other specialists including cardiologists, neurologists, and anaesthesiologists. Factors that affect failure to rescue rates in cardiac surgery and cardiovascular critical care include nurse staffing ratios, intensivist coverage, advanced specialist support, hospital and surgical volume, the presence of trainees, and patient comorbidities. Strategies to improve patient rescue include working to understand the mechanisms of failure to rescue, anticipating postoperative complications, prioritizing microsystem factors, enhancing early escalation of care, and educating and empowering junior clinicians. When used appropriately, the failure to rescue quality metric can help institutions focus on improving processes of care that minimize morbidity and mortality from rescuable complications after cardiac surgery.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85149711623&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.cjca.2023.01.001
DO - 10.1016/j.cjca.2023.01.001
M3 - Review article
C2 - 36621563
AN - SCOPUS:85149711623
SN - 0828-282X
VL - 39
SP - 487
EP - 496
JO - Canadian Journal of Cardiology
JF - Canadian Journal of Cardiology
IS - 4
ER -