Failure of LeVeen shunting in refractory ascites: A view from the other side

D. M. Grischkan, A. M. Cooperman, R. E. Hermann, W. D. Carey, D. R. Ferguson, S. A. Cook

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

13 Scopus citations

Abstract

The authors have reviewed their experience with 11 patients treated with LeVeen peritoneovenous shunts during a 22-month period from March, 1976, through December, 1977, to assess long-term results and shunt patency. Nine patients had follow-up studies to assess shunt patency at a mean of 26 months. After insertion of the shunt, the mean weight loss was 7.9 kg at hospital discharge. At 26-month follow-up evaluation, six patients had minimal ascites (responders), whereas five had massive ascites (nonresponders). Of the six responders, three patients with nonfunctioning shunts lost an average of 15.8 kg of ascites, whereas three with patent shunts lost an average of 15.0 kg. Eight of 11 patients (73%) required revision or replacement of the shunt because of malfunction; clotting was the most common cause of failure. It is concluded that the role and effectiveness of LeVeen peritoneovenous shunts remain questionable. They may cause diuresis, maintain it, or not be responsible for it at all. Clinical reports that cite their effectiveness should document patency of these shunts.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)304-308
Number of pages5
JournalSurgery
Volume89
Issue number3
StatePublished - 1981
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Failure of LeVeen shunting in refractory ascites: A view from the other side'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this