Failed endopyelotomy: Implications for future surgery on the ureteropelvic junction

J. A. Motola, R. Fried, G. H. Badlani, A. D. Smith

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

37 Scopus citations

Abstract

During the last 8 years we performed 212 endopyelotomies with an overall success rate of 86%. To determine if the failed endopyelotomies resulted in a more difficult subsequent open corrective procedure, we compared the procedures and outcomes of 15 failed endopyelotomies with 16 control patients undergoing pyeloplasty who had not undergone a previous endopyelotomy. The variables of duration of the surgical procedure, average estimated blood loss, average number of transfusions and average length of hospitalization were analyzed for both groups. No statistically significant differences were detected for any of these variables. We conclude that despite a previously failed endopyelotomy, a subsequent open operation on the ureteropelvic junction, although slightly more difficult, was not associated with an increased morbidity rate nor less successful than de novo pyeloplasty. Therefore, we continue to advocate endopyelotomy as the procedure of choice for obstruction of the ureteropelvic junction.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)821-823
Number of pages3
JournalJournal of Urology
Volume150
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1993
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • kidney diseases
  • ureteral obstruction

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Failed endopyelotomy: Implications for future surgery on the ureteropelvic junction'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this