Faculty Attitudes Towards Article Processing Charges for Open Access Articles

Gali Halevi, Samantha Walsh

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

28 Scopus citations

Abstract

Article Processing Charges (APCs) are significant charges for publishing Open Access (OA), and have no accepted standards for authors to source the funds or negotiate the charges. While there is a growing body of literature exploring academic authors’ perceptions of OA publishing, there is little data on how authors pay for APCs. The aim of this study was to examine how authors prepare for and fund APCs, as well as their perceptions of these charges. In early 2021 the authors deployed a survey to Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai faculty members via email. The survey was completed by 310 faculty, representing 10.6% of the active researcher population. Our findings show that about 50% of respondents include anticipated APC costs in grant applications, and that 16% of faculty will pay APCs using personal funds. Questions evaluating perception of APCs show that while the majority of respondents support the concept of Open Access, most believe that charges are too high and should not fall on authors.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)384-398
Number of pages15
JournalPublishing Research Quarterly
Volume37
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2021

Keywords

  • Academic Publishing
  • Article Processing Charges
  • Health Sciences Faculty
  • Hybrid Journals
  • NIH Public Access Policy
  • Open Access

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Faculty Attitudes Towards Article Processing Charges for Open Access Articles'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this