TY - JOUR
T1 - Examining Seizure Documentation Practices by Primary Care Clinicians
AU - Jacobs, Ariel
AU - Chiofalo, Jacqueline
AU - Shuman, Saskia
AU - Schiller, Robert Red
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025, American Board of Family Medicine. All rights reserved.
PY - 2025/7/1
Y1 - 2025/7/1
N2 - Background: Primary care clinicians (PCCs) frequently report low levels of comfort in managing seizure disorders, despite their essential role in caring for patients with seizures from systematically excluded groups. This study explores seizure care practices among PCCs at a federally qualified health center and examines possible associations between provider documentation of seizure care and proxy indicators for control of seizure disorder. Methods: This is a retrospective observational cohort study of patients presenting with a seizure disorder between 2015 and 2019. Logistic regression models examined the associations between patient demographics, clinical processes and outcomes, and electronic medical record documentation. Results: PCCs adhered to quality metrics for documentation in 41.5% of the 446 cases. PCCs documented seizure type 94.3% of the time but only recorded seizure frequency or time since last seizure 44.3% of the time. Most patients (52.3%) were referred to a neurologist. Better clinical documentation was significantly associated with referral to a neurologist (OR 1.73; 95%CI 1.14, 2.6; P = .009), visiting a neurologist (OR 1.7; 95%CI 1.13, 2.56; P = .01), and receiving a depression, anxiety, or quality of life screening (OR 2.97; 95%CI 1.84, 4.79; P < .001). Discussion: Our findings suggest the need for improvements in the documentation of seizure management in the primary care setting. PCCs may benefit from additional training or tools to improve their comfort with seizure treatment and understanding of the role of primary care for these disorders.
AB - Background: Primary care clinicians (PCCs) frequently report low levels of comfort in managing seizure disorders, despite their essential role in caring for patients with seizures from systematically excluded groups. This study explores seizure care practices among PCCs at a federally qualified health center and examines possible associations between provider documentation of seizure care and proxy indicators for control of seizure disorder. Methods: This is a retrospective observational cohort study of patients presenting with a seizure disorder between 2015 and 2019. Logistic regression models examined the associations between patient demographics, clinical processes and outcomes, and electronic medical record documentation. Results: PCCs adhered to quality metrics for documentation in 41.5% of the 446 cases. PCCs documented seizure type 94.3% of the time but only recorded seizure frequency or time since last seizure 44.3% of the time. Most patients (52.3%) were referred to a neurologist. Better clinical documentation was significantly associated with referral to a neurologist (OR 1.73; 95%CI 1.14, 2.6; P = .009), visiting a neurologist (OR 1.7; 95%CI 1.13, 2.56; P = .01), and receiving a depression, anxiety, or quality of life screening (OR 2.97; 95%CI 1.84, 4.79; P < .001). Discussion: Our findings suggest the need for improvements in the documentation of seizure management in the primary care setting. PCCs may benefit from additional training or tools to improve their comfort with seizure treatment and understanding of the role of primary care for these disorders.
KW - Cohort Studies
KW - Documentation
KW - Electronic Health Records
KW - Epilepsy
KW - Logistic Regression
KW - Primary Health Care
KW - Quality Improvement
KW - Quality of Care
KW - Seizures
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105022798620
U2 - 10.3122/jabfm.2024.240318R1
DO - 10.3122/jabfm.2024.240318R1
M3 - Article
C2 - 41115760
AN - SCOPUS:105022798620
SN - 1557-2625
VL - 38
SP - 735
EP - 739
JO - Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
JF - Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
IS - 4
ER -