Evolution of antithrombotic therapy for patients with atrial fibrillation: The prospective global GLORIA-AF registry program

Lea Beier, Shihai Lu, Lionel Riou França, Sabrina Marler, Gregory Y.H. Lip, Menno V. Huisman, Christine Teutsch, Jonathan L. Halperin, Kristina Zint, Hans Christoph Diener, Laurie Baker, Chang Sheng Ma, Miney Paquette, Dorothee B. Bartels, Sergio J. Dubner, Philippe Lyrer, Jochen Senges, Kenneth J. Rothman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Objective To assess baseline characteristics and antithrombotic treatment (ATT) prescription patterns in patients enrolled in the third phase of the GLORIA-AF Registry Program, evaluate predictors of treatment prescription, and compare results with phase II. Methods GLORIA-AF is a large, global, prospective registry program, enrolling patients with newly diagnosed nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF) at risk of stroke. Patients receiving dabigatran were followed for two years in phase II, and all patients were followed for 3 years in phase III. Phase II started when dabigatran became available; phase III started when the characteristics of patients receiving dabigatran became roughly comparable with those receiving vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). Results Between 2014 and 2016, 21,241 patients were enrolled in phase III. In total, 82% of patients were prescribed oral anticoagulation ([OAC]; 59.5% novel/nonvitamin K oral anticoagulants [NOACs], 22.7% VKAs). A further 11% of patients were prescribed antiplatelets without OAC and 7% were prescribed no ATT. A high stroke risk was the main driver of OAC prescription. Factors associated with prescription of VKA over NOAC included type of site, region, physician specialty, and impaired kidney function. Conclusion Over the past few years, data from phase III of GLORIA-AF show that OACs have become the standard treatment option, with most newly diagnosed AF patients prescribed a NOAC. However, in some regions a remarkable proportion of patients remain undertreated. In comparison with phase II, more patients received NOACs in phase III while the prescription of VKA decreased. VKAs were preferred over NOACs in patients with impaired kidney function.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere0274237
JournalPLoS ONE
Volume17
Issue number10 October
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2022

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Evolution of antithrombotic therapy for patients with atrial fibrillation: The prospective global GLORIA-AF registry program'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this