Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Everolimus Versus Sunitinib Prospective Evaluation in Metastatic Non-Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma (ESPN): A Randomized Multicenter Phase 2 Trial

  • Nizar M. Tannir
  • , Eric Jonasch
  • , Laurence Albiges
  • , Emre Altinmakas
  • , Chaan S. Ng
  • , Surena F. Matin
  • , Xuemei Wang
  • , Wei Qiao
  • , Zita Dubauskas Lim
  • , Pheroze Tamboli
  • , Priya Rao
  • , Kanishka Sircar
  • , Jose A. Karam
  • , David F. McDermott
  • , Christopher G. Wood
  • , Toni K. Choueiri

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

325 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background Sunitinib and everolimus are standard first-line and second-line therapies, respectively, in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). Objective To conduct a randomized phase 2 trial comparing sunitinib and everolimus in non-clear cell RCC (non-ccRCC). Design, setting, and participants Patients with metastatic, non-ccRCC, or ccRCC with >20% sarcomatoid features (ccSRCC) were randomized to receive sunitinib or everolimus with crossover at disease progression. Outcome measurement and statistical analysis Primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) in first-line therapy; 108 patients were needed to show improvement in median PFS (mPFS) from 12 wk with sunitinib to 20 wk with everolimus. Results and limitations Interim analysis of 68 patients (papillary [27], chromophobe [12], unclassified [10], translocation [7], ccSRCC [12]) prompted early trial closure. The mPFS in first-line therapy was 6.1 mo with sunitinib and 4.1 mo with everolimus (p = 0.6); median overall survival (mOS) was not reached with sunitinib and was 10.5 mo with everolimus, respectively (p = 0.014). At final analysis, mOS was 16.2 and 14.9 mo with sunitinib and everolimus, respectively (p = 0.18). There were four partial responses (PRs) in first-line therapy (sunitinib: 3 of 33 [9%]; everolimus, 1 of 35 [2.8%]) and four PRs in second-line therapy (sunitinib: 2 of 21 [9.5%]; everolimus, 2 of 23 [8.6%]), with mPFS of 1.8 mo and 2.8 mo, respectively. In patients without sarcomatoid features in their tumors (n = 49), mOS was 31.6 mo with sunitinib and 10.5 mo with everolimus (p = 0.075). Genomic profiling of a chromophobe RCC from a patient with a PR to first-line everolimus revealed a somatic TSC2 mutation. Conclusions In this trial, everolimus was not superior to sunitinib. Both agents demonstrated modest efficacy, underscoring the need for better therapies in non-ccRCC. Patient summary This randomized phase 2 trial provides the first head-to-head comparison of everolimus and sunitinib in patients with metastatic non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (non-ccRCC). The observed very modest efficacy underscores the need to develop more effective therapies for non-ccRCC.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)866-874
Number of pages9
JournalEuropean Urology
Volume69
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 May 2016
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Everolimus
  • Non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma
  • Renal cell carcinoma
  • Sunitinib

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Everolimus Versus Sunitinib Prospective Evaluation in Metastatic Non-Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma (ESPN): A Randomized Multicenter Phase 2 Trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this