Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Everolimus-Eluting versus Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents in Coronary Artery Disease

  • Gregg W. Stone
  • , Ali Rizvi
  • , William Newman
  • , Kourosh Mastali
  • , John C. Wang
  • , Ronald Caputo
  • , Julie Doostzadeh
  • , Sherry Cao
  • , Charles A. Simonton
  • , Krishnankutty Sudhir
  • , Alexandra J. Lansky
  • , Donald E. Cutlip
  • , Dean J. Kereiakes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

840 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Previous studies have established the superiority of coronary everolimus-eluting stents over paclitaxel-eluting stents with respect to angiographic findings. However, these trials were not powered for superiority in clinical end points. Methods: We randomly assigned 3687 patients at 66 U.S. sites to receive everolimus-eluting stents or paclitaxel-eluting stents without routine follow-up angiography. The primary end point was the 1-year composite rate of target-lesion failure (defined as cardiac death, target-vessel myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven target-lesion revascularization). Results: Everolimus-eluting stents were superior to paclitaxel-eluting stents with respect to the primary end point of target-lesion failure (4.2% vs. 6.8%; relative risk, 0.62; 95% confidence interval, 0.46 to 0.82; P = 0.001). Everolimus-eluting stents were also superior with respect to the major secondary end point of the 1-year rate of ischemia-driven target-lesion revascularization (P = 0.001) and were noninferior with respect to the major secondary end point of the 1-year composite rate of cardiac death or target-vessel myocardial infarction (P<0.001 for noninferiority; P = 0.09 for superiority). The 1-year rates of myocardial infarction and stent thrombosis were also lower with everolimus-eluting stents than with paclitaxel-eluting stents (1.9% vs. 3.1%, P = 0.02 for myocardial infarction; 0.17% vs. 0.85%, P = 0.004 for stent thrombosis). Target-lesion failure was consistently reduced with everolimus-eluting stents as compared with paclitaxel-eluting stents in 12 prespecified subgroups, except in the subgroup of patients with diabetes (6.4% vs. 6.9%, P = 0.80). Conclusions: Everolimus-eluting stents, as compared with paclitaxel-eluting stents, resulted in reduced rates of target-lesion failure at 1 year, results that were consistent in all patients except those with diabetes, in whom the results were nonsignificantly different. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00307047.)

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1663-1674
Number of pages12
JournalNew England Journal of Medicine
Volume362
Issue number18
DOIs
StatePublished - 6 May 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Everolimus-Eluting versus Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents in Coronary Artery Disease'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this