Evaluation of surgical procedures: Changing patterns of patient selection and costs in heart transplantation

K. Reemtsma, G. Berland, J. Merrill, R. Arons, C. Evans, R. Drusin, C. R. Smith, E. A. Rose, R. L. Hardesty, A. Cobanoglu, W. A. Gay, C. Yankah, R. M. Bolman, S. Attar

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

28 Scopus citations

Abstract

During the past 4 years we have observed a marked increase in costs of heart transplantation in our center. This trend coincides with a shift in our recipient population toward the more severely ill patients. The percentage of patients bound for the intensive care unit has doubled. In analyzing the components of cost, we find that the length of stay, both in special care and regular nursing units, accounts for most of the cost increase. In our study of outcomes we find no significant difference in survival, at 1 month and 1 year, between recipients operated on from the intensive care unit and those not in intensive care. We find that at 1 year after transplantation, approximately 80% of patients are rehabilitated, which we define as the ability to work or to go to school. Only 20% of patients are off disability rolls, however, primarily because of problems related to insurance and the cost of continuing care, including drugs. We conclude that the comprehensive evaluation of surgical procedures requires an approach that balances costs with results on a continuing and long-term basis.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1308-1313
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Volume104
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 1992
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluation of surgical procedures: Changing patterns of patient selection and costs in heart transplantation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this