TY - JOUR
T1 - Esophageal Deviation During Atrial Fibrillation Ablation
T2 - Clinical Experience With a Dedicated Esophageal Balloon Retractor
AU - Bhardwaj, Rahul
AU - Naniwadekar, Aditi
AU - Whang, William
AU - Mittnacht, Alexander J.
AU - Palaniswamy, Chandrasekar
AU - Koruth, Jacob S.
AU - Joshi, Kamal
AU - Sofi, Aamir
AU - Miller, Marc
AU - Choudry, Subbarao
AU - Dukkipati, Srinivas R.
AU - Reddy, Vivek Y.
N1 - Funding Information:
Drs. Dukkipati, Mittnacht, and Reddy hold equity interest in Manual Surgical Sciences Inc. Dr. Dukkipati has also received research grants from Biosense Webster. Dr. Reddy holds equity interest (stock options) in Circa Scientific, Inc. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 American College of Cardiology Foundation
PY - 2018/8
Y1 - 2018/8
N2 - Objectives: The goal of this study was to determine the safety and feasibility of a novel esophageal balloon retractor (DV8) for MED during PVI. Background: The authors previously showed that mechanical esophageal deviation (MED) is feasible using an off-the-shelf metal stylet to allow uninterrupted ablation along the posterior left atrium during pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). Although it is an attractive strategy to avoid esophageal thermal injury, this technique was hampered by both the propensity for oropharyngeal trauma from the stiff stylet and the limited lateral esophageal displacement. Methods: In 200 consecutive patients undergoing atrial fibrillation ablation, the DV8 balloon retractor was used for MED; contrast was instilled into the esophagus to accurately delineate the trailing esophageal edge. Deviation was performed to maximize the distance from the trailing esophageal edge to the closest point of the ablation line (MEDEffective) and correlated to occurrences of luminal esophageal temperature elevation. Results: In patients undergoing MED during a first-ever PVI of 304 vein pairs, the MEDEffective during right and left PVI were 21.2 ± 8.7 mm and 15.5 ± 6.8 mm, respectively. Deviation of at least 5 mm of MEDEffective was achievable in 97.7%. Luminal esophageal temperature increases universally occurred (100%) at MEDEffective <5 mm, less often (28%) at MEDEffective 5 to 20 mm, and rarely (1.9%) at MEDEffective >20 mm. There were no esophageal complications, but 2 patients experienced oropharyngeal bleeding due to trauma related to device placement. Conclusions: MED with the balloon retractor safely moved the esophagus away from the site of energy delivery during atrial fibrillation ablation.
AB - Objectives: The goal of this study was to determine the safety and feasibility of a novel esophageal balloon retractor (DV8) for MED during PVI. Background: The authors previously showed that mechanical esophageal deviation (MED) is feasible using an off-the-shelf metal stylet to allow uninterrupted ablation along the posterior left atrium during pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). Although it is an attractive strategy to avoid esophageal thermal injury, this technique was hampered by both the propensity for oropharyngeal trauma from the stiff stylet and the limited lateral esophageal displacement. Methods: In 200 consecutive patients undergoing atrial fibrillation ablation, the DV8 balloon retractor was used for MED; contrast was instilled into the esophagus to accurately delineate the trailing esophageal edge. Deviation was performed to maximize the distance from the trailing esophageal edge to the closest point of the ablation line (MEDEffective) and correlated to occurrences of luminal esophageal temperature elevation. Results: In patients undergoing MED during a first-ever PVI of 304 vein pairs, the MEDEffective during right and left PVI were 21.2 ± 8.7 mm and 15.5 ± 6.8 mm, respectively. Deviation of at least 5 mm of MEDEffective was achievable in 97.7%. Luminal esophageal temperature increases universally occurred (100%) at MEDEffective <5 mm, less often (28%) at MEDEffective 5 to 20 mm, and rarely (1.9%) at MEDEffective >20 mm. There were no esophageal complications, but 2 patients experienced oropharyngeal bleeding due to trauma related to device placement. Conclusions: MED with the balloon retractor safely moved the esophagus away from the site of energy delivery during atrial fibrillation ablation.
KW - atrial fibrillation ablation
KW - esophageal deviation
KW - esophagus
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85047351560&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jacep.2018.04.001
DO - 10.1016/j.jacep.2018.04.001
M3 - Article
C2 - 30139483
AN - SCOPUS:85047351560
SN - 2405-5018
VL - 4
SP - 1020
EP - 1030
JO - JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
JF - JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
IS - 8
ER -