Abstract
The authors regret that there was an error in Figure 2 of the manuscript. The correct figure is shown below (fig). The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused. Figure Legend: Figure 2. New recommended scoring and treatment algorithm for practice. AP, Alkaline phosphatase; CBD, common bile duct; DB, direct bilirubin; ERCP, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography; GGT, gammy glutamyl transferase; LC, laparoscopic cholecystectomy; LCIOC, laparoscopic cholecystectomy with intraoperative cholangiogram; MRCP, MR cholangiopancreatography; TB, total bilirubin.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1424 |
| Number of pages | 1 |
| Journal | Surgery (United States) |
| Volume | 160 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| DOIs |
|
| State | Published - 1 Nov 2016 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Erratum: Corrigendum to ‘Validation and improvement of a proposed scoring system to detect retained common bile duct stones in gallstone pancreatitis’ (Surgery (2015) 157(6) (1073–1079) (S0039606015000173) (10.1016/j.surg.2015.01.005))'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver