TY - JOUR
T1 - Epidemiology of occupational and environmental risk factors related to ovarian cancer
AU - Shen, Ningyan
AU - Weiderpass, Elisabete
AU - Anttila, Ahti
AU - Goldberg, Mark S.
AU - Vasama-Neuvonen, Kaisa M.
AU - Boffetta, Paolo
AU - Vainio, Harri U.
AU - Partanen, Timo J.
PY - 1998/6
Y1 - 1998/6
N2 - This paper reviews articles published during 1970-1997 from 48 epidemiologic studies on occupational and environmental risk factors of ovarian cancer. Current evidence is characterized by poorly focused data for occupational and environmental agents, vulnerability to biases, and an almost complete lack of quantitative exposure-response data. The moderate amount of data on nurses, teachers, professionals, dry cleaning employees, women in agriculture, the pharmaceutical industry, pharmacists, waitresses, and cooks show very little, if any, evidence of excess risk. Hairdressers, beauticians, and women employed in the printing industry may be at increased risk, but the data are insufficient for strong conclusions. Some case-referent studies suggest a modest-to-moderate excess in association with genital talc application. Few high-quality studies have been carried out, and no chemical agents have been studied extensively, with the exception of exposure to talc. Ovarian cancer may have occupational and environmental etiologies intertwined with cultural, behavioral, and life-style factors and genetic susceptibility, but current knowledge is insufficient to quantify occupational and environmental etiologies reliably. Well-designed analytic epidemiologic studies with sufficient power are needed.
AB - This paper reviews articles published during 1970-1997 from 48 epidemiologic studies on occupational and environmental risk factors of ovarian cancer. Current evidence is characterized by poorly focused data for occupational and environmental agents, vulnerability to biases, and an almost complete lack of quantitative exposure-response data. The moderate amount of data on nurses, teachers, professionals, dry cleaning employees, women in agriculture, the pharmaceutical industry, pharmacists, waitresses, and cooks show very little, if any, evidence of excess risk. Hairdressers, beauticians, and women employed in the printing industry may be at increased risk, but the data are insufficient for strong conclusions. Some case-referent studies suggest a modest-to-moderate excess in association with genital talc application. Few high-quality studies have been carried out, and no chemical agents have been studied extensively, with the exception of exposure to talc. Ovarian cancer may have occupational and environmental etiologies intertwined with cultural, behavioral, and life-style factors and genetic susceptibility, but current knowledge is insufficient to quantify occupational and environmental etiologies reliably. Well-designed analytic epidemiologic studies with sufficient power are needed.
KW - Etiology
KW - Exposure
KW - Occupation
KW - Ovarian neoplasms
KW - Review
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031851033&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.5271/sjweh.296
DO - 10.5271/sjweh.296
M3 - Review article
C2 - 9710369
AN - SCOPUS:0031851033
SN - 0355-3140
VL - 24
SP - 175
EP - 182
JO - Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health
JF - Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health
IS - 3
ER -