Entity extraction for clinical notes, a comparison between metamap and amazon comprehend medical

Fatemeh Shah-Mohammadi, Wanting Cui, Joseph Finkelstein

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

Extracting meaningful information from clinical notes is challenging due to their semi- or unstructured format. Clinical notes such as discharge summaries contain information about diseases, their risk factors, and treatment approaches associated to them. As such, it is critical for healthcare quality as well as for clinical research to extract those information and make them accessible to other computerized applications that rely on coded data. In this context, the goal of this paper is to compare the automatic medical entity extraction capacity of two available entity extraction tools: MetaMap (MM) and Amazon Comprehend Medical (ACM). Recall, precision and F-score have been used to evaluate the performance of the tools. The results show that ACM achieves higher average recall, average precision, and average F-score in comparison with MM.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationPublic Health and Informatics
Subtitle of host publicationProceedings of MIE 2021
PublisherIOS Press
Pages258-262
Number of pages5
ISBN (Electronic)9781643681856
ISBN (Print)9781643681849
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jul 2021

Keywords

  • Amazon Comprehend Medical (ACM)
  • Clinical documents
  • Entity Extraction
  • MetaMap (MM)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Entity extraction for clinical notes, a comparison between metamap and amazon comprehend medical'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this