TY - JOUR
T1 - Enhancing the readability of materials describing genetic risk for breast cancer
AU - Thompson, Hayley S.
AU - Wahl, Erica
AU - Fatone, Anne
AU - Brown, Karen
AU - Kwate, Naa Oyo A.
AU - Valdimarsdottir, Heiddis
PY - 2004
Y1 - 2004
N2 - Background: The number of individuals contemplating genetic testing is increasing, but the current materials and overall subject matter remain complex and not easily understood by many. The goal of this project was to evaluate efforts to revise and increase the readability of an existing information packet describing genetic risk for breast cancer. Methods: Evaluation was conducted in two stages through two related studies. In Study 1, a focus group of multiethnic breast cancer survivors was assembled to obtain feedback on images included in the revised breast cancer genetics information packet. In Study 2, African American adult students in a literacy program evaluated the revised images (based on the feedback of the focus group in Study 1) and text of the information packet and provided ratings on readability, format, and appearance. Results: Responses from Study 1 participants suggested that some of the images created for the packet needed to be clearer in the concepts they were intended to convey. In Study 2, ratings of adult learners suggested difficulty with word comprehension in spite of the inclusion of definitions and a glossary. The reading level achieved was markedly lower than the college reading level required by the original information packet and other patient-directed cancer genetics materials. Conclusions: Although efforts to clarify written materials in order to better serve patients with low literacy received generally favorable responses, continued efforts to create more user-friendly patient education materials are warranted.
AB - Background: The number of individuals contemplating genetic testing is increasing, but the current materials and overall subject matter remain complex and not easily understood by many. The goal of this project was to evaluate efforts to revise and increase the readability of an existing information packet describing genetic risk for breast cancer. Methods: Evaluation was conducted in two stages through two related studies. In Study 1, a focus group of multiethnic breast cancer survivors was assembled to obtain feedback on images included in the revised breast cancer genetics information packet. In Study 2, African American adult students in a literacy program evaluated the revised images (based on the feedback of the focus group in Study 1) and text of the information packet and provided ratings on readability, format, and appearance. Results: Responses from Study 1 participants suggested that some of the images created for the packet needed to be clearer in the concepts they were intended to convey. In Study 2, ratings of adult learners suggested difficulty with word comprehension in spite of the inclusion of definitions and a glossary. The reading level achieved was markedly lower than the college reading level required by the original information packet and other patient-directed cancer genetics materials. Conclusions: Although efforts to clarify written materials in order to better serve patients with low literacy received generally favorable responses, continued efforts to create more user-friendly patient education materials are warranted.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=3242763036&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/107327480401100406
DO - 10.1177/107327480401100406
M3 - Article
C2 - 15284716
AN - SCOPUS:3242763036
SN - 1073-2748
VL - 11
SP - 245
EP - 253
JO - Cancer Control
JF - Cancer Control
IS - 4
ER -