Enhancing COVID-19 vaccination coverage using financial incentives: Arguments to help health providers counterbalance erroneous claims

Jelena Dotlic, Vida Jeremic Stojkovic, Paul Cummins, Marija Milic, Tatjana Gazibara

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Scopus citations

Abstract

Financial reimbursements after receiving the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine have been criticized in the literature. This strategy has been described as payment to receive the vaccines, undue inducement, and unethical. We are aware that healthcare workers who work in primary healthcare, prevention, and public health may encounter similar reasons from people who refuse vaccination against COVID-19. For this reason, we are compelled to clarify these claims and provide arguments for all healthcare workers who might be challenged by such reasoning. In this critical review, we discuss why the claims against financial incentives that have been presented in the literature are erroneous.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere2021081
JournalEpidemiology and health
Volume43
DOIs
StatePublished - 2021

Keywords

  • COVID-19
  • Financial support
  • Reimbursement
  • Vaccination

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Enhancing COVID-19 vaccination coverage using financial incentives: Arguments to help health providers counterbalance erroneous claims'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this