Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Endovascular Thrombectomy for Pediatric Acute Ischemic Stroke

  • Alis J. Dicpinigaitis
  • , Chirag D. Gandhi
  • , Jared Pisapia
  • , Carrie R. Muh
  • , Jared B. Cooper
  • , Michael Tobias
  • , Avinash Mohan
  • , Rolla Nuoman
  • , Philip Overby
  • , Justin Santarelli
  • , Simon Hanft
  • , Christian Bowers
  • , Shadi Yaghi
  • , Stephan A. Mayer
  • , Fawaz Al-Mufti

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

33 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Evidence regarding the utilization and outcomes of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) for pediatric ischemic stroke is limited, and justification for its use is largely based on extrapolation from clinical benefits observed in adults. Methods: Weighted discharge data from the National Inpatient Sample were queried to identify pediatric patients with ischemic stroke (<18 years old) during the period of 2010 to 2019. Complex samples statistical methods were used to characterize the profiles and clinical outcomes of EVT-treated patients. Propensity adjustment was performed to address confounding by indication for EVT based on disparities in baseline characteristics between EVT-treated patients and those medically managed. Results: Among 7365 pediatric patients with ischemic stroke identified, 190 (2.6%) were treated with EVT. Utilization significantly increased in the post-EVT clinical trial era (2016-2019; 1.7% versus 4.0%; P<0.001), while the use of decompressive hemicraniectomy decreased (2.8% versus 0.7%; P<0.001). On unadjusted analysis, 105 (55.3%) EVT-treated patients achieved favorable functional outcomes at discharge (home or to acute rehabilitation), while no periprocedural iatrogenic complications or instances of contrast-induced kidney injury were reported. Following propensity adjustment, EVT-treated patients demonstrated higher absolute but nonsignificant rates of favorable functional outcomes in comparison with medically managed patients (55.3% versus 52.8%; P=0.830; adjusted hazard ratio, 1.01 [95% CI, 0.51-2.03]; P=0.972 for unfavorable outcome). Among patients with baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score >11 (75th percentile of scores in cohort), EVT-treated patients trended toward higher rates of favorable functional outcomes compared with those treated medically only (71.4% versus 55.6%; P=0.146). In a subcohort assessment of EVT-treated patients, those administered preceding thrombolytic therapy (n=79, 41.6%) trended toward higher rates of favorable functional outcomes (63.3% versus 49.5%; P=0.060). Conclusions: This cross-sectional evaluation of the clinical course and short-term outcomes of pediatric patients with ischemic stroke treated with EVT demonstrates that EVT is likely a safe modality which confers high rates of favorable functional outcomes.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1530-1539
Number of pages10
JournalStroke
Volume53
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 May 2022
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • adolescent
  • brain ischemia
  • cross-sectional studies
  • inpatients
  • patient discharge

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Endovascular Thrombectomy for Pediatric Acute Ischemic Stroke'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this