TY - JOUR
T1 - Endovascular therapy for anterior circulation emergent large vessel occlusion stroke in patients with large ischemic cores
T2 - A report of the SNIS Standards and Guidelines Committee
AU - SNIS Standards and Guidelines Committee, SNIS Board of Directors
AU - Al-Mufti, Fawaz
AU - Marden, Franklin A.
AU - Burkhardt, Jan Karl
AU - Raper, Daniel
AU - Schirmer, Clemens M.
AU - Baker, Amanda
AU - Chen, Peng Roc
AU - Bulsara, Ketan R.
AU - Narsinh, Kazim H.
AU - Amans, Matthew Robert
AU - Cooper, Jared
AU - Yaghi, Shadi
AU - Al-Kawaz, Mais
AU - Hetts, Steven W.
AU - Jayaraman, Mahesh V.
AU - Fifi, Johanna T.
AU - Dabus, Guilherme
AU - Fraser, Justin F.
AU - Kan, Peter
AU - Heit, Jeremy J.
AU - Amans, Matthew R.
AU - Mendes-Pereira, Vitor
AU - Samaniego, Edgar
AU - Mocco, J.
AU - Chen, Michael
AU - Grossman, Jonathan A.
AU - Tsai, Jenny
AU - Froehler, Michael T.
AU - Albuquerque, Felipe C.
AU - Baxter, Blaise W.
AU - Ansari, Sameer
AU - Hetts, Steven W.
AU - Schirmer, Clemens
AU - Jayaraman, Mahesh
AU - Fraser, Justin
AU - Heit, Jeremy
AU - Amans, Matthew
AU - Sheth, Sunil
AU - Prestigiacomo, Charles
AU - Tenser, Matthew
AU - Haranhalli, Neil
AU - Bulsara, Ketan
AU - Tjoumakaris, Stavropoula
AU - Al-Mufti, Fawaz
AU - Pahwa, Shivani
AU - Narsinh, Kazim
AU - Chaudhary, Neeraj
AU - Burkhardt, Jan Karl
AU - Marden, Franklin
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024.
PY - 2024/8/14
Y1 - 2024/8/14
N2 - Background Early clinical trials validating endovascular therapy (EVT) for emergent large vessel occlusion (ELVO) ischemic stroke in the anterior circulation initially focused on patients with small or absent completed infarctions (ischemic cores) to maximize the probability of detecting a clinically meaningful and statistically significant benefit of EVT. Subsequently, real-world experience suggested that patients with large core ischemic strokes (LCS) at presentation may also benefit from EVT. Several large, retrospective, and prospective randomized clinical trials have recently been published that further validate this approach. These guidelines aim to provide an update for endovascular treatment of LCS. Methods A structured literature review of LCS studies available since 2019 and grading the strength and quality of the evidence was performed. Recommendations were made based on these new data by consensus of the authors, with additional input from the full SNIS Standards and Guidelines Committee and the SNIS Board of Directors. Results The management of ELVO strokes with large ischemic cores continues to evolve. The expert panel agreed on several recommendations: Recommendation 1: In patients with anterior circulation ELVO who present within 24 hours of last known normal with large infarct core (70-149 mL or ASPECTS 3-5) and meet other criteria of RESCUE-Japan LIMIT, SELECT2, ANGEL-ASPECT, TESLA, TENSION, or LASTE trials, thrombectomy is indicated (Class I, Level A). Recommendations 2-7 flow directly from recommendation 1. Recommendation 2: EVT in patients with LCS aged 18-85 years is beneficial (Class I, Level A). Recommendation 3: EVT in patients with LCS >85 years of age may be beneficial (Class I, Level B-R). Recommendation 4: Patients with LCS and NIHSS score 6-30 benefit from EVT in LCS (Class I, Level A). Recommendation 5: Patients with LCS and NIHSS score <6 and >30 may benefit from EVT in LCS (Class IIa, Level A). Recommendation 6: Patients with LCS and low baseline mRS (0-1) benefit from EVT (Class I, Level A). Recommendation 7: Patients with LCS and time of last known well 0-24 hours benefit from EVT (Class I, Level A). Recommendation 8: It is recommended that patients with ELVO LCS who also meet the criteria for on-label or guideline-directed use of IV thrombolysis receive IV thrombolysis, irrespective of whether endovascular treatments are being considered (Class I, Level B-NR). Conclusions The indications for endovascular treatment of ELVO strokes continue to expand and now include patients with large ischemic cores on presentation. Further prospective randomized studies, including follow-up to assess the population-based efficacy of treating patients with LCS, are warranted.
AB - Background Early clinical trials validating endovascular therapy (EVT) for emergent large vessel occlusion (ELVO) ischemic stroke in the anterior circulation initially focused on patients with small or absent completed infarctions (ischemic cores) to maximize the probability of detecting a clinically meaningful and statistically significant benefit of EVT. Subsequently, real-world experience suggested that patients with large core ischemic strokes (LCS) at presentation may also benefit from EVT. Several large, retrospective, and prospective randomized clinical trials have recently been published that further validate this approach. These guidelines aim to provide an update for endovascular treatment of LCS. Methods A structured literature review of LCS studies available since 2019 and grading the strength and quality of the evidence was performed. Recommendations were made based on these new data by consensus of the authors, with additional input from the full SNIS Standards and Guidelines Committee and the SNIS Board of Directors. Results The management of ELVO strokes with large ischemic cores continues to evolve. The expert panel agreed on several recommendations: Recommendation 1: In patients with anterior circulation ELVO who present within 24 hours of last known normal with large infarct core (70-149 mL or ASPECTS 3-5) and meet other criteria of RESCUE-Japan LIMIT, SELECT2, ANGEL-ASPECT, TESLA, TENSION, or LASTE trials, thrombectomy is indicated (Class I, Level A). Recommendations 2-7 flow directly from recommendation 1. Recommendation 2: EVT in patients with LCS aged 18-85 years is beneficial (Class I, Level A). Recommendation 3: EVT in patients with LCS >85 years of age may be beneficial (Class I, Level B-R). Recommendation 4: Patients with LCS and NIHSS score 6-30 benefit from EVT in LCS (Class I, Level A). Recommendation 5: Patients with LCS and NIHSS score <6 and >30 may benefit from EVT in LCS (Class IIa, Level A). Recommendation 6: Patients with LCS and low baseline mRS (0-1) benefit from EVT (Class I, Level A). Recommendation 7: Patients with LCS and time of last known well 0-24 hours benefit from EVT (Class I, Level A). Recommendation 8: It is recommended that patients with ELVO LCS who also meet the criteria for on-label or guideline-directed use of IV thrombolysis receive IV thrombolysis, irrespective of whether endovascular treatments are being considered (Class I, Level B-NR). Conclusions The indications for endovascular treatment of ELVO strokes continue to expand and now include patients with large ischemic cores on presentation. Further prospective randomized studies, including follow-up to assess the population-based efficacy of treating patients with LCS, are warranted.
KW - Standards
KW - Stroke
KW - Thrombectomy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85186083551&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1136/jnis-2023-021444
DO - 10.1136/jnis-2023-021444
M3 - Review article
C2 - 38395601
AN - SCOPUS:85186083551
SN - 1759-8478
VL - 16
SP - 870
EP - 877
JO - Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery
JF - Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery
IS - 9
ER -