TY - JOUR
T1 - Endovascular rescue of long-term vascular graft implants and need for continuous surveillance
AU - Leoce, Brian M.
AU - Dardik, Herbert
AU - Bahramipour, Phillip
AU - Bernik, Thomas R.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 The Authors
PY - 2018/3
Y1 - 2018/3
N2 - We present two cases of vascular graft degradation after long-term implantation. In both patients, endovascular techniques were employed to effect continued graft patency and function. Furthermore, these cases lend further credence to the doctrine of lifelong surveillance of all vascular interventions regardless of graft material. Postoperative surveillance of vascular interventions is generally recommended to avoid failures by identifying “the failing graft”1 at the earliest possible time to facilitate corrective procedures. There is a tendency that with continued function, over time, surveillance methods are spread farther apart and in fact often discontinued. Recent experiences with two cases illustrate the vital importance of lifelong continuous surveillance regardless of the site, graft material, or absence of symptoms. Clearly, the patient's compliance is essential. Both patients consented to the publication of their cases.
AB - We present two cases of vascular graft degradation after long-term implantation. In both patients, endovascular techniques were employed to effect continued graft patency and function. Furthermore, these cases lend further credence to the doctrine of lifelong surveillance of all vascular interventions regardless of graft material. Postoperative surveillance of vascular interventions is generally recommended to avoid failures by identifying “the failing graft”1 at the earliest possible time to facilitate corrective procedures. There is a tendency that with continued function, over time, surveillance methods are spread farther apart and in fact often discontinued. Recent experiences with two cases illustrate the vital importance of lifelong continuous surveillance regardless of the site, graft material, or absence of symptoms. Clearly, the patient's compliance is essential. Both patients consented to the publication of their cases.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85039459514&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jvscit.2017.09.004
DO - 10.1016/j.jvscit.2017.09.004
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85039459514
SN - 2352-667X
VL - 4
SP - 12
EP - 14
JO - Journal of Vascular Surgery Cases, Innovations and Techniques
JF - Journal of Vascular Surgery Cases, Innovations and Techniques
IS - 1
ER -