TY - JOUR
T1 - End-of-Life Care, Palliative Care Consultation, and Palliative Care Referral in the Emergency Department
T2 - A Systematic Review
AU - AAHPM Research Committee Writing Group
AU - Wilson, Jennifer G.
AU - English, Diana P.
AU - Owyang, Clark G.
AU - Chimelski, Erica A.
AU - Grudzen, Corita R.
AU - Wong, Hong nei
AU - Aslakson, Rebecca A.
AU - Ast, Katherine
AU - Carroll, Thomas
AU - Dzeng, Elizabeth
AU - Harrison, Krista L.
AU - Kaye, Erica C.
AU - LeBlanc, Thomas W.
AU - Lo, Shelly S.
AU - McKenna, Kelly
AU - Nageswaran, Savithri
AU - Powers, James
AU - Rotella, Joseph
AU - Ullrich, Christina
AU - Vickey, Theresa
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine
PY - 2020/2
Y1 - 2020/2
N2 - Context: There is growing interest in providing palliative care (PC) in the emergency department (ED), but relatively little is known about the efficacy of ED-based PC interventions. A 2016 systematic review on this topic found no evidence that ED-based PC interventions affect patient outcomes or health care utilization, but new research has emerged since the publication of that review. Objectives: This systematic review provides a concise summary of current literature addressing the impact of ED-based PC interventions on patient-reported or family reported outcomes, health care utilization, and survival. Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature from inception until September 1, 2018 and reviewed references. Eligible articles evaluated the effects of PC interventions in the ED on patient-reported or family reported outcomes, health care utilization, or survival. Results: We screened 3091 abstracts and 98 full-text articles with 13 articles selected for final inclusion. Two articles reported the results of a single randomized controlled trial, whereas the remaining 11 studies were descriptive or quasi-experimental cohort studies. More than half of the included articles were published after the previous systematic review on this topic. Populations studied included older adults, patients with advanced malignancy, and ED patients screening positive for unmet PC needs. Most interventions involved referral to hospice or PC or PC provided directly in the ED. Compared with usual care, ED-PC interventions improved quality of life, although this improvement was not observed when comparing ED-PC to inpatient PC. ED-PC interventions expedited PC consultation; most studies reported a concomitant reduction in hospital length of stay and increase in hospice utilization, but some data were conflicting. Short-term mortality rates were high across all studies, but ED-PC interventions did not decrease survival time compared with usual care. Conclusion: Existing data support that PC in the ED is feasible, may improve quality of life, and does not appear to affect survival.
AB - Context: There is growing interest in providing palliative care (PC) in the emergency department (ED), but relatively little is known about the efficacy of ED-based PC interventions. A 2016 systematic review on this topic found no evidence that ED-based PC interventions affect patient outcomes or health care utilization, but new research has emerged since the publication of that review. Objectives: This systematic review provides a concise summary of current literature addressing the impact of ED-based PC interventions on patient-reported or family reported outcomes, health care utilization, and survival. Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature from inception until September 1, 2018 and reviewed references. Eligible articles evaluated the effects of PC interventions in the ED on patient-reported or family reported outcomes, health care utilization, or survival. Results: We screened 3091 abstracts and 98 full-text articles with 13 articles selected for final inclusion. Two articles reported the results of a single randomized controlled trial, whereas the remaining 11 studies were descriptive or quasi-experimental cohort studies. More than half of the included articles were published after the previous systematic review on this topic. Populations studied included older adults, patients with advanced malignancy, and ED patients screening positive for unmet PC needs. Most interventions involved referral to hospice or PC or PC provided directly in the ED. Compared with usual care, ED-PC interventions improved quality of life, although this improvement was not observed when comparing ED-PC to inpatient PC. ED-PC interventions expedited PC consultation; most studies reported a concomitant reduction in hospital length of stay and increase in hospice utilization, but some data were conflicting. Short-term mortality rates were high across all studies, but ED-PC interventions did not decrease survival time compared with usual care. Conclusion: Existing data support that PC in the ED is feasible, may improve quality of life, and does not appear to affect survival.
KW - Palliative care
KW - emergency department
KW - emergency medicine
KW - family reported outcomes
KW - health care utilization
KW - hospice
KW - patient-reported outcomes
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85075469998&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2019.09.020
DO - 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2019.09.020
M3 - Article
C2 - 31586580
AN - SCOPUS:85075469998
SN - 0885-3924
VL - 59
SP - 372-383.e1
JO - Journal of Pain and Symptom Management
JF - Journal of Pain and Symptom Management
IS - 2
ER -