TY - JOUR
T1 - Empiric and targeted treatment of enterococcal infections
T2 - Opportunities for antimicrobial stewardship
AU - Taimur, Sarah
AU - Miller, Nancy S.
AU - Whitney, Dana
AU - Barlam, Tamar
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2014 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
PY - 2015
Y1 - 2015
N2 - Background Enterococcal infections are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. Infections caused by vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) are a growing public health problem. We studied antimicrobial treatment of enterococcal infections to identify opportunities to improve clinical practice. Methods We reviewed retrospective data on patients hospitalized with enterococcal bloodstream infections (EBSIs) and enterococcal urinary tract infections (EUTIs) from 2008 to 2009. For EBSI, the antimicrobial treatment at the time when blood culture Gram-stain results were reported was termed empiric, whereas the antimicrobial treatment when the peptide nucleic acid in situ fluorescence hybridization results were available was termed targeted. For EUTI, the antimicrobial therapy at the time when urine culture indicated enterococci was empiric, and targeted therapy was antimicrobial at the time when susceptibilities were reported. Results Of 65 patients with EBSI, Enterococcus faecalis caused 38 infections, Enterococcus faecium caused 24, and Enterococcus gallinarum caused 3. Vancomycin resistance was demonstrated in 42% of blood isolates; of those, 78% were E. faecium. Overall, 44 patients (68%) with EBSI received vancomycin empirically; of those, 17 patients (39%) had isolates that were VRE. Vancomycin was given as targeted therapy to 12 patients, of which a total of 4 isolates were VRE. Among patients with EUTI who received empiric therapy, 24 (45%) of 53 received vancomycin, of which 10 isolates were VRE. Targeted therapy was given to 56 patients with EUTI, of which 18 received vancomycin and 39% (7/18) were VRE. Conclusions Vancomycin was commonly used for both empiric and targeted therapy. Vancomycin-resistant enterococci was frequent, and empiric therapy was inadequate in most of those cases. Targeted therapy for both EBSI and EUTI was often not tailored to more appropriate agents. Our findings indicate many stewardship opportunities to improve prescribing for enterococcal treatment.
AB - Background Enterococcal infections are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. Infections caused by vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) are a growing public health problem. We studied antimicrobial treatment of enterococcal infections to identify opportunities to improve clinical practice. Methods We reviewed retrospective data on patients hospitalized with enterococcal bloodstream infections (EBSIs) and enterococcal urinary tract infections (EUTIs) from 2008 to 2009. For EBSI, the antimicrobial treatment at the time when blood culture Gram-stain results were reported was termed empiric, whereas the antimicrobial treatment when the peptide nucleic acid in situ fluorescence hybridization results were available was termed targeted. For EUTI, the antimicrobial therapy at the time when urine culture indicated enterococci was empiric, and targeted therapy was antimicrobial at the time when susceptibilities were reported. Results Of 65 patients with EBSI, Enterococcus faecalis caused 38 infections, Enterococcus faecium caused 24, and Enterococcus gallinarum caused 3. Vancomycin resistance was demonstrated in 42% of blood isolates; of those, 78% were E. faecium. Overall, 44 patients (68%) with EBSI received vancomycin empirically; of those, 17 patients (39%) had isolates that were VRE. Vancomycin was given as targeted therapy to 12 patients, of which a total of 4 isolates were VRE. Among patients with EUTI who received empiric therapy, 24 (45%) of 53 received vancomycin, of which 10 isolates were VRE. Targeted therapy was given to 56 patients with EUTI, of which 18 received vancomycin and 39% (7/18) were VRE. Conclusions Vancomycin was commonly used for both empiric and targeted therapy. Vancomycin-resistant enterococci was frequent, and empiric therapy was inadequate in most of those cases. Targeted therapy for both EBSI and EUTI was often not tailored to more appropriate agents. Our findings indicate many stewardship opportunities to improve prescribing for enterococcal treatment.
KW - bloodstream infections
KW - urinary tract infections
KW - vancomycin usage
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84988299706&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/IPC.0000000000000193
DO - 10.1097/IPC.0000000000000193
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84988299706
SN - 1056-9103
VL - 23
SP - 72
EP - 75
JO - Infectious Diseases in Clinical Practice
JF - Infectious Diseases in Clinical Practice
IS - 2
ER -