TY - JOUR
T1 - Emergency Department Care Transitions for Patients With Cognitive Impairment
T2 - A Scoping Review
AU - The GEAR 2.0-ADC Network
AU - Gettel, Cameron J.
AU - Falvey, Jason R.
AU - Gifford, Angela
AU - Hoang, Ly
AU - Christensen, Leslie A.
AU - Hwang, Ula
AU - Shah, Manish N.
AU - Aggarawal, Neelum
AU - Allore, Heather
AU - Amy, Aloysi
AU - Belleville, Michael
AU - Bellolio, M. Fernanda
AU - Betz, Marian (Emmy)
AU - Biese, Kevin
AU - Brandt, Cynthia
AU - Bruursema, Stacey
AU - Carnahan, Ryan
AU - Carpenter, Christopher
AU - Carr, David
AU - Chin-Hansen, Jennie
AU - Daven, Morgan
AU - Degesys, Nida
AU - Dresden, M. Scott
AU - Dussetschleger, Jeffrey
AU - Ellenbogen, Michael
AU - Falvey, Jason
AU - Foster, Beverley
AU - Gettel, Cameron
AU - Gilmore-Bykovskyi, Andrea
AU - Goldberg, Elizabeth
AU - Han, Jin
AU - Hardy, James
AU - Hastings, S. Nicole
AU - Hirshon, Jon Mark
AU - Hogan, Tess
AU - Hung, William
AU - Isaacs, Eric
AU - Jaspal, Naveena
AU - Jobe, Deb
AU - Johnson, Jerry
AU - Kelly, Kathleen (Kathy)
AU - Kennedy, Maura
AU - Kind, Amy
AU - Leggett, Jesseca
AU - Malone, Michael
AU - Moccia, Michelle
AU - Moreno, Monica
AU - Morrow-Howell, Nancy
AU - Nowroozpoor, Armin
AU - Sano, Mary
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Authors
PY - 2022/8
Y1 - 2022/8
N2 - Objectives: We aimed to describe emergency department (ED) care transition interventions delivered to older adults with cognitive impairment, identify relevant patient-centered outcomes, and determine priority research areas for future investigation. Design: Systematic scoping review. Setting and Participants: ED patients with cognitive impairment and/or their care partners. Methods: Informed by the clinical questions, we conducted systematic electronic searches of medical research databases for relevant publications following published guidelines. The results were presented to a stakeholder group representing ED-based and non-ED-based clinicians, individuals living with cognitive impairment, care partners, and advocacy organizations. After discussion, they voted on potential research areas to prioritize for future investigations. Results: From 3848 publications identified, 78 eligible studies underwent full text review, and 10 articles were abstracted. Common ED-to-community care transition interventions for older adults with cognitive impairment included interdisciplinary geriatric assessments, home visits from medical personnel, and telephone follow-ups. Intervention effects were mixed, with improvements observed in 30-day ED revisit rates but most largely ineffective at promoting connections to outpatient care or improving secondary outcomes such as physical function. Outcomes identified as important to adults with cognitive impairment and their care partners included care coordination between providers and inclusion of care partners in care management within the ED setting. The highest priority research area for future investigation identified by stakeholders was identifying strategies to tailor ED-to-community care transitions for adults living with cognitive impairment complicated by other vulnerabilities such as social isolation or economic disadvantage. Conclusions and Implications: This scoping review identified key gaps in ED-to-community care transition interventions delivered to older adults with cognitive impairment. Combined with a stakeholder assessment and prioritization, it identified relevant patient-centered outcomes and clarifies priority areas for future investigation to improve ED care for individuals with impaired cognition, an area of critical need given the current population trends.
AB - Objectives: We aimed to describe emergency department (ED) care transition interventions delivered to older adults with cognitive impairment, identify relevant patient-centered outcomes, and determine priority research areas for future investigation. Design: Systematic scoping review. Setting and Participants: ED patients with cognitive impairment and/or their care partners. Methods: Informed by the clinical questions, we conducted systematic electronic searches of medical research databases for relevant publications following published guidelines. The results were presented to a stakeholder group representing ED-based and non-ED-based clinicians, individuals living with cognitive impairment, care partners, and advocacy organizations. After discussion, they voted on potential research areas to prioritize for future investigations. Results: From 3848 publications identified, 78 eligible studies underwent full text review, and 10 articles were abstracted. Common ED-to-community care transition interventions for older adults with cognitive impairment included interdisciplinary geriatric assessments, home visits from medical personnel, and telephone follow-ups. Intervention effects were mixed, with improvements observed in 30-day ED revisit rates but most largely ineffective at promoting connections to outpatient care or improving secondary outcomes such as physical function. Outcomes identified as important to adults with cognitive impairment and their care partners included care coordination between providers and inclusion of care partners in care management within the ED setting. The highest priority research area for future investigation identified by stakeholders was identifying strategies to tailor ED-to-community care transitions for adults living with cognitive impairment complicated by other vulnerabilities such as social isolation or economic disadvantage. Conclusions and Implications: This scoping review identified key gaps in ED-to-community care transition interventions delivered to older adults with cognitive impairment. Combined with a stakeholder assessment and prioritization, it identified relevant patient-centered outcomes and clarifies priority areas for future investigation to improve ED care for individuals with impaired cognition, an area of critical need given the current population trends.
KW - Care transitions
KW - cognitive impairment
KW - emergency department
KW - patient-centered outcomes
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85126520528&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jamda.2022.01.076
DO - 10.1016/j.jamda.2022.01.076
M3 - Review article
C2 - 35247358
AN - SCOPUS:85126520528
SN - 1525-8610
VL - 23
SP - 1313.e1-1313.e13
JO - Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
JF - Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
IS - 8
ER -