TY - JOUR
T1 - Electronic Geriatric Assessment
T2 - Is It Feasible in a Multi-Institutional Study That Included a Notable Proportion of Older African American Patients? (Alliance A171603)
AU - Guerard, Emily
AU - Dodge, Andrew B.
AU - Le-Rademacher, Jennifer G.
AU - Kemeny, M. Margaret
AU - Ojelabi, Michael
AU - Sedrak, Mina S.
AU - Hopkins, Judith
AU - Shahrokni, Armin
AU - Harlos, Elizabeth
AU - Muss, Hyman
AU - Cohen, Harvey Jay
AU - Lafky, Jacqueline
AU - Sloan, Jeff
AU - Jatoi, Aminah
AU - Hurria, Arti
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - PURPOSE This study determined whether an electronic version of the geriatric assessment is feasible in a multiinstitutional, diverse setting. METHODS Ten sites within the Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology participated. Patients who had active cancer or a history of cancer and were 65 years of age or older were eligible. The geriatric assessment was completed with an electronic data capture system that had been loaded onto iPads. Feasibility was defined a priori as completion in at least 70% of patients either with or without help. To enhance racial diversity, the original sample size was later changed and augmented by 50% with the intention of increasing enrollment of older minority patients. RESULTS A total of one hundred fifty-four patients were registered with a median age of 72 years (range, 65-91 years). Forty-three (28%) identified themselves as African American or Black. One hundred forty-one patients (92%) completed the electronic geriatric assessment. Feasibility was observed across all subgroups, regardless of race, education, performance status, comorbidities, and cognition; 124 patients (81%) completed the geriatric assessment without help. Reasons for not completing the geriatric assessment are as follows: clinic visit did not occur (n = 6), no iPad connection to the Internet (n = 3), patient declined (n = 2), prolonged hospitalization (n = 1), and patient died (n = 1). Reasons for needing help, as reported by study personnel, were as follows: the patient preferred that research personnel ask the questions (n = 9), vision problem (n = 3), lack of comfort with the iPad (n = 2), questions were not clear (n = 1), less proficient in English (n = 1), and challenge in pressing the green button to go to the next question (n = 1). CONCLUSION The electronic geriatric assessment is feasible in a multi-institutional setting that includes a notable proportion of African American or Black patients.
AB - PURPOSE This study determined whether an electronic version of the geriatric assessment is feasible in a multiinstitutional, diverse setting. METHODS Ten sites within the Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology participated. Patients who had active cancer or a history of cancer and were 65 years of age or older were eligible. The geriatric assessment was completed with an electronic data capture system that had been loaded onto iPads. Feasibility was defined a priori as completion in at least 70% of patients either with or without help. To enhance racial diversity, the original sample size was later changed and augmented by 50% with the intention of increasing enrollment of older minority patients. RESULTS A total of one hundred fifty-four patients were registered with a median age of 72 years (range, 65-91 years). Forty-three (28%) identified themselves as African American or Black. One hundred forty-one patients (92%) completed the electronic geriatric assessment. Feasibility was observed across all subgroups, regardless of race, education, performance status, comorbidities, and cognition; 124 patients (81%) completed the geriatric assessment without help. Reasons for not completing the geriatric assessment are as follows: clinic visit did not occur (n = 6), no iPad connection to the Internet (n = 3), patient declined (n = 2), prolonged hospitalization (n = 1), and patient died (n = 1). Reasons for needing help, as reported by study personnel, were as follows: the patient preferred that research personnel ask the questions (n = 9), vision problem (n = 3), lack of comfort with the iPad (n = 2), questions were not clear (n = 1), less proficient in English (n = 1), and challenge in pressing the green button to go to the next question (n = 1). CONCLUSION The electronic geriatric assessment is feasible in a multi-institutional setting that includes a notable proportion of African American or Black patients.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85104395787&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1200/CCI.20.00163
DO - 10.1200/CCI.20.00163
M3 - Article
C2 - 33852323
AN - SCOPUS:85104395787
SN - 2473-4276
VL - 5
SP - 435
EP - 441
JO - JCO clinical cancer informatics
JF - JCO clinical cancer informatics
ER -