TY - JOUR
T1 - Efficacy of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Superficial Gastric Neoplasia in a Large Cohort in North America
AU - Ngamruengphong, Saowanee
AU - Ferri, Lorenzo
AU - Aihara, Hiroyuki
AU - Draganov, Peter V.
AU - Yang, Dennis J.
AU - Perbtani, Yaseen B.
AU - Jue, Terry L.
AU - Munroe, Craig A.
AU - Boparai, Eshandeep S.
AU - Mehta, Neal A.
AU - Bhatt, Amit
AU - Kumta, Nikhil A.
AU - Othman, Mohamed O.
AU - Mercado, Michael
AU - Javaid, Huma
AU - Aadam, Abdul Aziz
AU - Siegel, Amanda
AU - James, Theodore W.
AU - Grimm, Ian S.
AU - DeWitt, John M.
AU - Novikov, Aleksey
AU - Schlachterman, Alexander
AU - Kowalski, Thomas
AU - Samarasena, Jason
AU - Hashimoto, Rintaro
AU - Chehade, Nabil El Hage
AU - Lee, John
AU - Chang, Kenneth
AU - Su, Bailey
AU - Ujiki, Michael B.
AU - Mehta, Amit
AU - Sharaiha, Reem Z.
AU - Carr-Locke, David L.
AU - Chen, Alex
AU - Chen, Michael
AU - Chen, Yen I.
AU - Pourmousavi Khoshknab, Mir Milad
AU - Wang, Rui
AU - Kerdsirichairat, Tossapol
AU - Tomizawa, Yutaka
AU - von Renteln, Daniel
AU - Kumbhari, Vivek
AU - Khashab, Mouen A.
AU - Bechara, Robert
AU - Karasik, Michael
AU - Patel, Neej J.
AU - Fukami, Norio
AU - Nishimura, Makoto
AU - Hanada, Yuri
AU - Wong Kee Song, Louis M.
AU - Laszkowska, Monika
AU - Wang, Andrew Y.
AU - Hwang, Joo Ha
AU - Friedland, Shai
AU - Sethi, Amrita
AU - Kalloo, Antony N.
N1 - Funding Information:
Conflicts of interest The following authors disclose the following: Amrita Sethi has served as a consultant for Boston Scientific and Olympus. Amit Bhatt has served as a speaker for Aries Pharmaceuticals and a consultant for Medtronic. Nikhil A. Kumta has served as a consultant for Apollo Endosurgery, Boston Scientific, and Olympus. Mouen A. Khashab has served on the medical advisory board for Boston Scientific and Olympus America; and served as a consultant for Boston Scientific, Olympus America, and Medtronic. Anthony N. Kalloo is a founding member, owns equity in, and has served as a consultant for Apollo Endosurgery. Dennis Yang has served as a consultant for Boston Scientific, Lumendi, and US Endoscopy. Peter V. Draganov has served as a consultant for Boston Scientific, Lumendi, Cook, Olympus, and Microtech. Vivek Kumbhari has served as a consultant for Medtronic, Reshape Lifesciences, Boston Scientific, Pentax Medical, and Apollo Endosurgery; and has received research support from ERBE USA and Apollo Endosurgery. Saowanee Ngamruengphong has served as a consultant for Boston Scientific. Yen-I Chen has served as a consultant for Boston Scientific. Daniel von Renteln has received research funding from ERBE, Ventage, Pendopharm; and Pentax; and served as a consultant for Boston Scientific and Pendopharm. Hiroyuki Aihara has served as a consultant for Olympus America, Boston Scientific, Fujifilm Medical Systems, Auris Health, and Lumendi. Michael B. Ujiki has served as a consultant for Olympus and Boston Scientific. Ian Grimm has served as a consultant for Boston Scientific. Mohamed O. Othman has served as a consultant for AbbVie, Boston Scientific, Olympus Corporation of America, and Lumendi. Reem Z. Sharaiha has served as a consultant for Boston Scientific and Apollo Endosurgery. Kenneth Chang has served as a consultant for or received grant support from Apollo, Boston Scientific, ERBE, C2 Therapeutics, Cook, Covidien, Endogastric Solutions, Mederi, Medtronic, Olympus, Ovesco, Pentax, and Torax. Norio Fukami has served as a consultant for Boston Scientific and Olympus America. Makoto Nishimura has served as a consultant for Boston Scientific. The remaining authors disclose no conflicts.
Funding Information:
Conflicts of interest The following authors disclose the following: Amrita Sethi has served as a consultant for Boston Scientific and Olympus. Amit Bhatt has served as a speaker for Aries Pharmaceuticals and a consultant for Medtronic. Nikhil A. Kumta has served as a consultant for Apollo Endosurgery, Boston Scientific, and Olympus. Mouen A. Khashab has served on the medical advisory board for Boston Scientific and Olympus America; and served as a consultant for Boston Scientific, Olympus America, and Medtronic. Anthony N. Kalloo is a founding member, owns equity in, and has served as a consultant for Apollo Endosurgery. Dennis Yang has served as a consultant for Boston Scientific, Lumendi, and US Endoscopy. Peter V. Draganov has served as a consultant for Boston Scientific, Lumendi, Cook, Olympus, and Microtech. Vivek Kumbhari has served as a consultant for Medtronic, Reshape Lifesciences, Boston Scientific, Pentax Medical, and Apollo Endosurgery; and has received research support from ERBE USA and Apollo Endosurgery. Saowanee Ngamruengphong has served as a consultant for Boston Scientific. Yen-I Chen has served as a consultant for Boston Scientific. Daniel von Renteln has received research funding from ERBE, Ventage, Pendopharm; and Pentax; and served as a consultant for Boston Scientific and Pendopharm. Hiroyuki Aihara has served as a consultant for Olympus America, Boston Scientific, Fujifilm Medical Systems, Auris Health, and Lumendi. Michael B. Ujiki has served as a consultant for Olympus and Boston Scientific. Ian Grimm has served as a consultant for Boston Scientific. Mohamed O. Othman has served as a consultant for AbbVie, Boston Scientific, Olympus Corporation of America, and Lumendi. Reem Z. Sharaiha has served as a consultant for Boston Scientific and Apollo Endosurgery. Kenneth Chang has served as a consultant for or received grant support from Apollo, Boston Scientific, ERBE, C2 Therapeutics, Cook, Covidien, Endogastric Solutions, Mederi, Medtronic, Olympus, Ovesco, Pentax, and Torax. Norio Fukami has served as a consultant for Boston Scientific and Olympus America. Makoto Nishimura has served as a consultant for Boston Scientific. The remaining authors disclose no conflicts.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 AGA Institute
PY - 2021/8
Y1 - 2021/8
N2 - Background & Aims: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a widely accepted treatment option for superficial gastric neoplasia in Asia, but there are few data on outcomes of gastric ESD from North America. We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of gastric ESD in North America. Methods: We analyzed data from 347 patients who underwent gastric ESD at 25 centers, from 2010 through 2019. We collected data on patient demographics, lesion characteristics, procedure details and related adverse events, treatment outcomes, local recurrence, and vital status at the last follow up. For the 277 patients with available follow-up data, the median interval between initial ESD and last clinical or endoscopic evaluation was 364 days. The primary endpoint was the rate of en bloc and R0 resection. Secondary outcomes included curative resection, rates of adverse events and recurrence, and gastric cancer-related death. Results: Ninety patients (26%) had low-grade adenomas or dysplasia, 82 patients (24%) had high-grade dysplasia, 139 patients (40%) had early gastric cancer, and 36 patients (10%) had neuroendocrine tumors. Proportions of en bloc and R0 resection for all lesions were 92%/82%, for early gastric cancers were 94%/75%, for adenomas and low-grade dysplasia were 93%/ 92%, for high-grade dysplasia were 89%/ 87%, and for neuroendocrine tumors were 92%/75%. Intraprocedural perforation occurred in 6.6% of patients; 82% of these were treated successfully with endoscopic therapy. Delayed bleeding occurred in 2.6% of patients. No delayed perforation or procedure-related deaths were observed. There were local recurrences in 3.9% of cases; all occurred after non-curative ESD resection. Metachronous lesions were identified in 14 patients (6.9%). One of 277 patients with clinical follow up died of metachronous gastric cancer that occurred 2.5 years after the initial ESD. Conclusions: ESD is a highly effective treatment for superficial gastric neoplasia and should be considered as a viable option for patients in North America. The risk of local recurrence is low and occurs exclusively after non-curative resection. Careful endoscopic surveillance is necessary to identify and treat metachronous lesions.
AB - Background & Aims: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a widely accepted treatment option for superficial gastric neoplasia in Asia, but there are few data on outcomes of gastric ESD from North America. We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of gastric ESD in North America. Methods: We analyzed data from 347 patients who underwent gastric ESD at 25 centers, from 2010 through 2019. We collected data on patient demographics, lesion characteristics, procedure details and related adverse events, treatment outcomes, local recurrence, and vital status at the last follow up. For the 277 patients with available follow-up data, the median interval between initial ESD and last clinical or endoscopic evaluation was 364 days. The primary endpoint was the rate of en bloc and R0 resection. Secondary outcomes included curative resection, rates of adverse events and recurrence, and gastric cancer-related death. Results: Ninety patients (26%) had low-grade adenomas or dysplasia, 82 patients (24%) had high-grade dysplasia, 139 patients (40%) had early gastric cancer, and 36 patients (10%) had neuroendocrine tumors. Proportions of en bloc and R0 resection for all lesions were 92%/82%, for early gastric cancers were 94%/75%, for adenomas and low-grade dysplasia were 93%/ 92%, for high-grade dysplasia were 89%/ 87%, and for neuroendocrine tumors were 92%/75%. Intraprocedural perforation occurred in 6.6% of patients; 82% of these were treated successfully with endoscopic therapy. Delayed bleeding occurred in 2.6% of patients. No delayed perforation or procedure-related deaths were observed. There were local recurrences in 3.9% of cases; all occurred after non-curative ESD resection. Metachronous lesions were identified in 14 patients (6.9%). One of 277 patients with clinical follow up died of metachronous gastric cancer that occurred 2.5 years after the initial ESD. Conclusions: ESD is a highly effective treatment for superficial gastric neoplasia and should be considered as a viable option for patients in North America. The risk of local recurrence is low and occurs exclusively after non-curative resection. Careful endoscopic surveillance is necessary to identify and treat metachronous lesions.
KW - Dysplasia
KW - EGC
KW - Endoscopic resection
KW - Stomach cancer
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85108523624&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.cgh.2020.06.023
DO - 10.1016/j.cgh.2020.06.023
M3 - Article
C2 - 32565290
AN - SCOPUS:85108523624
SN - 1542-3565
VL - 19
SP - 1611-1619.e1
JO - Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
JF - Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
IS - 8
ER -