TY - JOUR
T1 - Efficacy of Dupilumab in a Phase 2 Randomized Trial of Adults With Active Eosinophilic Esophagitis
AU - Hirano, Ikuo
AU - Dellon, Evan S.
AU - Hamilton, Jennifer D.
AU - Collins, Margaret H.
AU - Peterson, Kathryn
AU - Chehade, Mirna
AU - Schoepfer, Alain M.
AU - Safroneeva, Ekaterina
AU - Rothenberg, Marc E.
AU - Falk, Gary W.
AU - Assouline-Dayan, Yehudith
AU - Zhao, Qiong
AU - Chen, Zhen
AU - Swanson, Brian N.
AU - Pirozzi, Gianluca
AU - Mannent, Leda
AU - Graham, Neil M.H.
AU - Akinlade, Bolanle
AU - Stahl, Neil
AU - Yancopoulos, George D.
AU - Radin, Allen
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 AGA Institute
PY - 2020/1
Y1 - 2020/1
N2 - Background & Aims: Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is an allergen-mediated inflammatory disease with no approved treatment in the United States. Dupilumab, a VelocImmune-derived human monoclonal antibody against the interleukin (IL) 4 receptor, inhibits IL4 and IL13 signaling. Dupilumab is effective in the treatment of allergic, atopic, and type 2 diseases, so we assessed its efficacy and safety in patients with EoE. Methods: We performed a phase 2 study of adults with active EoE (2 episodes of dysphagia/week with peak esophageal eosinophil density of 15 or more eosinophils per high-power field), from May 12, 2015, through November 9, 2016, at 14 sites. Participants were randomly assigned to groups that received weekly subcutaneous injections of dupilumab (300 mg, n = 23) or placebo (n = 24) for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was change from baseline to week 10 in Straumann Dysphagia Instrument (SDI) patient-reported outcome (PRO) score. We also assessed histologic features of EoE (peak esophageal intraepithelial eosinophil count and EoE histologic scores), endoscopically visualized features (endoscopic reference score), esophageal distensibility, and safety. Results: The mean SDI PRO score was 6.4 when the study began. In the dupilumab group, SDI PRO scores were reduced by a mean value of 3.0 at week 10 compared with a mean reduction of 1.3 in the placebo group (P =. 0304). At week 12, dupilumab reduced the peak esophageal intraepithelial eosinophil count by a mean 86.8 eosinophils per high-power field (reduction of 107.1%; P <. 0001 vs placebo), the EoE-histologic scoring system (HSS) severity score by 68.3% (P <. 0001 vs placebo), and the endoscopic reference score by 1.6 (P =. 0006 vs placebo). Dupilumab increased esophageal distensibility by 18% vs placebo (P <. 0001). Higher proportions of patients in the dupilumab group developed injection-site erythema (35% vs 8% in the placebo group) and nasopharyngitis (17% vs 4% in the placebo group). Conclusions: In a phase 2 trial of patients with active EoE, dupilumab reduced dysphagia, histologic features of disease (including eosinophilic infiltration and a marker of type 2 inflammation), and abnormal endoscopic features compared with placebo. Dupilumab increased esophageal distensibility and was generally well tolerated. ClinicalTrials.gov,
AB - Background & Aims: Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is an allergen-mediated inflammatory disease with no approved treatment in the United States. Dupilumab, a VelocImmune-derived human monoclonal antibody against the interleukin (IL) 4 receptor, inhibits IL4 and IL13 signaling. Dupilumab is effective in the treatment of allergic, atopic, and type 2 diseases, so we assessed its efficacy and safety in patients with EoE. Methods: We performed a phase 2 study of adults with active EoE (2 episodes of dysphagia/week with peak esophageal eosinophil density of 15 or more eosinophils per high-power field), from May 12, 2015, through November 9, 2016, at 14 sites. Participants were randomly assigned to groups that received weekly subcutaneous injections of dupilumab (300 mg, n = 23) or placebo (n = 24) for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was change from baseline to week 10 in Straumann Dysphagia Instrument (SDI) patient-reported outcome (PRO) score. We also assessed histologic features of EoE (peak esophageal intraepithelial eosinophil count and EoE histologic scores), endoscopically visualized features (endoscopic reference score), esophageal distensibility, and safety. Results: The mean SDI PRO score was 6.4 when the study began. In the dupilumab group, SDI PRO scores were reduced by a mean value of 3.0 at week 10 compared with a mean reduction of 1.3 in the placebo group (P =. 0304). At week 12, dupilumab reduced the peak esophageal intraepithelial eosinophil count by a mean 86.8 eosinophils per high-power field (reduction of 107.1%; P <. 0001 vs placebo), the EoE-histologic scoring system (HSS) severity score by 68.3% (P <. 0001 vs placebo), and the endoscopic reference score by 1.6 (P =. 0006 vs placebo). Dupilumab increased esophageal distensibility by 18% vs placebo (P <. 0001). Higher proportions of patients in the dupilumab group developed injection-site erythema (35% vs 8% in the placebo group) and nasopharyngitis (17% vs 4% in the placebo group). Conclusions: In a phase 2 trial of patients with active EoE, dupilumab reduced dysphagia, histologic features of disease (including eosinophilic infiltration and a marker of type 2 inflammation), and abnormal endoscopic features compared with placebo. Dupilumab increased esophageal distensibility and was generally well tolerated. ClinicalTrials.gov,
KW - EREFS
KW - Esophagus
KW - Food Allergy
KW - HSS
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85076252562
U2 - 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.09.042
DO - 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.09.042
M3 - Article
C2 - 31593702
AN - SCOPUS:85076252562
SN - 0016-5085
VL - 158
SP - 111-122.e10
JO - Gastroenterology
JF - Gastroenterology
IS - 1
ER -