TY - JOUR
T1 - Efficacy and Safety of Immunosuppressive Therapy in Primary Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis
T2 - A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
AU - Caster, Dawn J.
AU - Magalhaes, Barbara
AU - Pennese, Natali
AU - Zaffalon, Andrea
AU - Faiella, Marina
AU - Campbell, Kirk N.
AU - Radhakrishnan, Jai
AU - Tesar, Vladmir
AU - Trachtman, Howard
N1 - Funding Information:
Dawn J. Caster, MD, Barbara Magalhaes, PhD, Natali Pennese, PhD, Andrea Zaffalon, PhD, Marina Faiella, PhD, Kirk N. Campbell, MD, Jai Radhakrishnan, MD, Vladmir Tesar, MD, and Howard Trachtman, MD. Research idea and study design: BM, NP, AZ, MF; data extraction and analysis: BM, NP, AZ, MF; data interpretation: DJC, KNC, JR, VT, HT. Each author contributed important intellectual content during manuscript drafting or revision and accepts accountability for the overall work by ensuring that questions pertaining to the accuracy or integrity of any portion of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. This systematic literature review was funded by Travere Therapeutics, Inc. Travere Therapeutics did not have a role in the study design; collection, analysis, and interpretation of the data; writing of the report; or the decision to submit the report for publication. Dr Caster has received consultancy fees from Aurinia, Calliditas, GlaxoSmithKline, and Travere Therapeutics. Drs Magalhaes, Pennese, Zaffalon, Faiella, have received consultancy fees from Travere Therapeutics. Dr Campbell has received consultancy fees from Aurinia, Goldfinch, Mallinckrodt, and Travere Therapeutics. Dr Radhakrishnan has no competing interests to declare. Dr Tesar has received consultancy fees from AbbVie, Amgen, Bayer, Boehringer-Ingelheim, ChemoCentryx, and Fresenius Medical Care. Dr Trachtman has received consultancy fees from ChemoCentryx, Kaneka, and Otsuka; was previously a consultant to Genzyme and Optherion; and has consultancy agreements with Goldfinch Biopharma and Travere Therapeutics through New York University. Editorial support was provided by Courtney Breuel, ELS, of MedVal Scientific Information Services, LLC (Princeton, NJ). Received May 11, 2022. Evaluated by 2 external peer reviewers, with direct editorial input by an Associate Editor and the Editor-in-Chief. Accepted in revised form June 2, 2022.
Funding Information:
This systematic literature review was funded by Travere Therapeutics, Inc. Travere Therapeutics did not have a role in the study design; collection, analysis, and interpretation of the data; writing of the report; or the decision to submit the report for publication.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022
PY - 2022/8
Y1 - 2022/8
N2 - Rationale & Objective: Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) is a rare condition that can lead to kidney function decline and chronic kidney failure. Immunosuppressants are used to treat primary FSGS. However, their efficacy and safety in FSGS are not clearly established. We assessed current knowledge on clinical effectiveness and safety of immunosuppressants for primary FSGS. Study Design: Systematic review of randomized controlled trials, interventional nonrandomized controlled trials, observational studies, retrospective studies, and registries. Setting & Participants: Patients with primary and genetic FSGS. Selection Criteria for Studies: Medline, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for English-language, primary-FSGS studies from inception to 2019. Clinical outcomes were changes from baseline in proteinuria, kidney function, and kidney survival. Data Extraction: 2 investigators independently screened studies and extracted data. Analytical Approach: Study results were summarized using random-effects models either as ratios of means between follow-up and baseline measurements or as HRs. Results: We included 98 articles. Substantial heterogeneity was observed in patient baseline characteristics and study designs. Most studies assessed treatment with corticosteroids alone or combined with other drugs, mainly immunosuppressants. Patients treated with immunosuppressants showed reduced proteinuria (14 studies; ratio of means, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.20-0.47), decreased creatinine clearance (mean difference, −25.03; 95% CI, −59.33 to −9.27) and (significantly) lower estimated glomerular filtration rates (mean difference, −7.61 mL/min/1.73 m2; 95% CI, −14.98 to 0.25 mL/min/1.73 m2). Immunosuppressant therapy had an uncertain effect on reducing the chronic kidney failure risk. Hypertension and infections were the most commonly reported adverse events. Limitations: Heterogeneity in study designs, patient populations, and treatment regimens; no access to individual patient–level data. Conclusions: This systematic review supports proteinuria reduction with immunosuppressant therapy in primary FSGS over varying follow-up periods. The effects of immunosuppressants on kidney survival remain uncertain. This review underscores the need for better-designed and adequately controlled studies to assess immunosuppressant therapy in patients with primary FSGS.
AB - Rationale & Objective: Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) is a rare condition that can lead to kidney function decline and chronic kidney failure. Immunosuppressants are used to treat primary FSGS. However, their efficacy and safety in FSGS are not clearly established. We assessed current knowledge on clinical effectiveness and safety of immunosuppressants for primary FSGS. Study Design: Systematic review of randomized controlled trials, interventional nonrandomized controlled trials, observational studies, retrospective studies, and registries. Setting & Participants: Patients with primary and genetic FSGS. Selection Criteria for Studies: Medline, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for English-language, primary-FSGS studies from inception to 2019. Clinical outcomes were changes from baseline in proteinuria, kidney function, and kidney survival. Data Extraction: 2 investigators independently screened studies and extracted data. Analytical Approach: Study results were summarized using random-effects models either as ratios of means between follow-up and baseline measurements or as HRs. Results: We included 98 articles. Substantial heterogeneity was observed in patient baseline characteristics and study designs. Most studies assessed treatment with corticosteroids alone or combined with other drugs, mainly immunosuppressants. Patients treated with immunosuppressants showed reduced proteinuria (14 studies; ratio of means, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.20-0.47), decreased creatinine clearance (mean difference, −25.03; 95% CI, −59.33 to −9.27) and (significantly) lower estimated glomerular filtration rates (mean difference, −7.61 mL/min/1.73 m2; 95% CI, −14.98 to 0.25 mL/min/1.73 m2). Immunosuppressant therapy had an uncertain effect on reducing the chronic kidney failure risk. Hypertension and infections were the most commonly reported adverse events. Limitations: Heterogeneity in study designs, patient populations, and treatment regimens; no access to individual patient–level data. Conclusions: This systematic review supports proteinuria reduction with immunosuppressant therapy in primary FSGS over varying follow-up periods. The effects of immunosuppressants on kidney survival remain uncertain. This review underscores the need for better-designed and adequately controlled studies to assess immunosuppressant therapy in patients with primary FSGS.
KW - Chronic kidney failure
KW - end-stage kidney disease
KW - end-stage renal disease
KW - focal segmental glomerulosclerosis
KW - immunosuppressive therapy
KW - proteinuria
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85135952293&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.xkme.2022.100501
DO - 10.1016/j.xkme.2022.100501
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85135952293
VL - 4
JO - Kidney Medicine
JF - Kidney Medicine
SN - 2590-0595
IS - 8
M1 - 100501
ER -