TY - JOUR
T1 - Effects of new calcium channel blocker, azelnidipine, and amlodipine on baroreflex sensitivity and ambulatory blood pressure
AU - Eguchi, Kazuo
AU - Tomizawa, Hidenori
AU - Ishikawa, Joji
AU - Hoshide, Satoshi
AU - Fukuda, Toshio
AU - Numao, Toshio
AU - Shimada, Kazuyuki
AU - Kario, Kazuomi
PY - 2007/6
Y1 - 2007/6
N2 - The effect of dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker (CCB) on baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) is not well described. We studied the effect of a new CCB, azelnidipine, compared with amlodipine, on BRS and ambulatory blood pressure (BP) in newly diagnosed untreated hypertension. This study was a prospective, randomized, and open-label study. We randomized patients to either azelnidipine or amlodipine treatment. Azelnidipine 8 to 16 mg (average 14.5 mg) and amlodipine 2.5 to 7.5 mg (average 4.9 mg) were used to lower the clinical BP <140/90 mm Hg. BRS, evaluated by the spontaneous and the Valsalva methods, and clinical and ambulatory BP were evaluated at baseline and after 13 weeks of each treatment. A total of 47 patients (age 53.1 ± 10.8 years, 51% male), 26 in the azelnidipine group and 21 in the amlodipine group, completed the study. For baseline and after therapy respectively, both Valsalva-BRS (4.8 ± 1.7 vs. 8.4 ± 3.1 msec/mm Hg, P = 0.001) and spontaneous-BRS (5.5 ± 2.5 vs. 8.2 ± 5.6 msec/mm Hg, P = 0.019) were increased by azelnidipine, but amlodipine did not change them. Clinical and awake BPs were similarly reduced by each drug therapy. In conclusion, BRS was increased by azelnidipine therapy, but not by amlodipine therapy. This differential effect may be important in cardiovascular risk reduction.
AB - The effect of dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker (CCB) on baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) is not well described. We studied the effect of a new CCB, azelnidipine, compared with amlodipine, on BRS and ambulatory blood pressure (BP) in newly diagnosed untreated hypertension. This study was a prospective, randomized, and open-label study. We randomized patients to either azelnidipine or amlodipine treatment. Azelnidipine 8 to 16 mg (average 14.5 mg) and amlodipine 2.5 to 7.5 mg (average 4.9 mg) were used to lower the clinical BP <140/90 mm Hg. BRS, evaluated by the spontaneous and the Valsalva methods, and clinical and ambulatory BP were evaluated at baseline and after 13 weeks of each treatment. A total of 47 patients (age 53.1 ± 10.8 years, 51% male), 26 in the azelnidipine group and 21 in the amlodipine group, completed the study. For baseline and after therapy respectively, both Valsalva-BRS (4.8 ± 1.7 vs. 8.4 ± 3.1 msec/mm Hg, P = 0.001) and spontaneous-BRS (5.5 ± 2.5 vs. 8.2 ± 5.6 msec/mm Hg, P = 0.019) were increased by azelnidipine, but amlodipine did not change them. Clinical and awake BPs were similarly reduced by each drug therapy. In conclusion, BRS was increased by azelnidipine therapy, but not by amlodipine therapy. This differential effect may be important in cardiovascular risk reduction.
KW - Ambulatory blood pressure
KW - Amlodipine
KW - Azelnidipine
KW - Baroreflex sensitivity
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34347219753&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/FJC.0b013e31804d1cf1
DO - 10.1097/FJC.0b013e31804d1cf1
M3 - Article
C2 - 17577104
AN - SCOPUS:34347219753
SN - 0160-2446
VL - 49
SP - 394
EP - 400
JO - Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology
JF - Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology
IS - 6
ER -