Effect of isoelectric point on biodistribution and inflammation imaging with indium-111-labelled IgG

  • Caroline I.ten Kate
  • , Alan J. Fischman
  • , Robert H. Rubin
  • , A. J. Fucello
  • , D. Riexinger
  • , Robert A. Wilkinson
  • , Lina Du
  • , Ban An Khaw
  • , H. William Strauss

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

21 Scopus citations

Abstract

Electrostatic effects play an important role in protein interactions and may alter the biodistribution of antibodies. To study the effect of molecular charge on the biodistribution and infection imaging properties of human polyclonal immunoglobulin G (IgG), its iso electric point was varied by changing the level of diethylene triamine penta-acetic acid (DTPA) substitution: 0.8, 0.9, 3.7, 5.1 and 5.9 DTPA/IgG. Biodistributions of the different IgG preparations were determined at 10 min, 1, 6, 24, and 48 h post injection in normal rats, and infection imaging properties were determined in rats with Escherichia coli thigh infections. The biodistribution was significantly affected by pl. The immunoglobulin preparations with 0.9 and 3.7 DTPA/IgG showed faster clearance from the circulation and generally lower accumulation in most organs. The images had a target-to-background ratio of approximately 1.3-2.3:1. These results suggest that even though targeting is not affected by the level of DTPA substitutions, preparations with 0.9 and 3.7 DTPA/IgG may be superior imaging agents because of reduced accumulation by background organs.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)305-309
Number of pages5
JournalEuropean Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Volume17
Issue number6-8
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1990
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Biodistribution
  • Diethylene triamine penta-acetic acid
  • IgG
  • Indium
  • Infection
  • Isoelectric point
  • Radiolabelledantibody

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Effect of isoelectric point on biodistribution and inflammation imaging with indium-111-labelled IgG'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this