Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Effect of CYP3A-inducing anti-epileptics on sorafenib exposure: Results of a phase II study of sorafenib plus daily temozolomide in adults with recurrent glioblastoma

  • David A. Reardon
  • , James J. Vredenburgh
  • , Annick Desjardins
  • , Katherine Peters
  • , Sridharan Gururangan
  • , John H. Sampson
  • , Jennifer Marcello
  • , James E. Herndon
  • , Roger E. McLendon
  • , Dorothea Janney
  • , Allan H. Friedman
  • , Darell D. Bigner
  • , Henry S. Friedman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

114 Scopus citations

Abstract

Sorafenib, an oral VEGFR-2, Raf, PDGFR, c-KIT and Flt-3 inhibitor, is active against renal cell and hepatocellular carcinomas, and has recently demonstrated promising activity for lung and breast cancers. In addition, various protracted temozolomide dosing schedules have been evaluated as a strategy to further enhance its anti-tumor activity. We reasoned that sorafenib and protracted, daily temozolomide may provide complementary therapeutic benefit, and therefore performed a phase 2 trial among recurrent glioblastoma patients. Adult glioblastoma patients at any recurrence after standard temozolomide chemoradiotherapy received sorafenib (400 mg twice daily) and continuous daily temozolomide (50 mg/m2/day). Assessments were performed every eight weeks. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival at 6 months (PFS-6) and secondary end points were radiographic response, overall survival (OS), safety and sorafenib pharmacokinetics. Of 32 enrolled patients, 12 (38%) were on CYP3-A inducing anti-epileptics (EIAEDs), 17 (53%) had 2 or more prior progressions, 15 had progressed while receiving 5-day temozolomide, and 12 (38%) had failed either prior bevacizumab or VEGFR inhibitor therapy. The most common grade ≥ 3 toxicities were palmer-planter erythrodysesthesia (19%) and elevated amylase/lipase (13%). Sorafenib pharmacokinetic exposures were comparable on day 1 regardless of EIAED status, but significantly lower on day 28 for patients on EIAEDs (P = 0.0431). With a median follow-up of 93 weeks, PFS-6 was 9.4%. Only one patient (3%) achieved a partial response. In conclusion, sorafenib can be safely administered with daily temozolomide, but this regimen has limited activity for recurrent GBM. Co-administration of EIAEDs can lower sorafenib exposures in this population.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)57-66
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Neuro-Oncology
Volume101
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2011
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Glioblastoma
  • Raf
  • Sorafenib
  • Temozolomide
  • VEGF

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Effect of CYP3A-inducing anti-epileptics on sorafenib exposure: Results of a phase II study of sorafenib plus daily temozolomide in adults with recurrent glioblastoma'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this