Effect of continuous positive airway pressure on ventricular remodeling of patients with combined diabetes mellitus and obstructive sleep apnea: a cross-sectional study and follow-on randomized clinical trial

  • Thiago Quinaglia
  • , Jessie P. Bakker
  • , Dimitrios Baltzis
  • , Raymond H. Chan
  • , Warren J. Manning
  • , Meredith L. Wallace
  • , Carlos Gongora
  • , Hannah K. Gilman
  • , Supraja Sama
  • , Terry Ho
  • , Andrei C. Sposito
  • , Otavio Coelho-Filho
  • , Margo Hudson
  • , Michael Jerosch-Herold
  • , Aristidis Veves
  • , Atul Malhotra
  • , Sanjay R. Patel
  • , Tomas G. Neilan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) are independently associated with adverse left (LV) and right (RV) ventricular remodeling. However, little is known about the effect of T2DM and OSA overlap and any additional impact of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). Methods: In this prospective study, 141 participants (Control: 28; T2DM only: 27; OSA only: 29; T2DM + OSA: 57) underwent sleep testing and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR). Subsequently, 53 with T2DM + OSA were randomized in a 3-month, parallel-arm, trial comparing active and sham CPAP. Measures of interest were LV and RV remodeling indices (mass/volume). Results: Groups were of similar sex; T2DM + OSA participants were older and had a higher BMI. At baseline, LV remodeling index (g/ml) was higher in T2DM + OSA (0.67 ± 0.12; 0.71 ± 0.10; 0.75 ± 0.13; 0.78 ± 0.16* respectively, p = 0.01vs. control), whereas RV remodeling index was similar (0.19 ± 0.03; 0.20 ± 0.03; 0.20 ± 0.03; 0.21 ± 0.04; p = 0.33). The difference in LV remodeling index persisted after adjustment for age, sex, and BMI (p < 0.001). The diagnoses of OSA only (b coefficient: 0.08, p = 0.04), and of OSA + T2DM (interaction term; b coefficient: 0.11, p < 0.01) were associated with adverse LV but not RV remodeling. CPAP treatment for 3 months prevented progression of adverse LV remodeling [difference: CPAP: −0.01 (−0.08, 0.08) g/ml; sham: 0.11 (−0.03, 0.17) g/ml; p = 0.03)] but not RV remodeling [difference: CPAP: 0.01 (−0.04, 0.08) g/ml; sham: 0.003 (−0.02, 0.04) g/ml; p = 0.82)]. Conclusion: The overlap of T2DM and OSA had an incremental effect on adverse LV remodeling but not RV remodeling. CPAP prevented the progression of LV but not RV remodeling.

Original languageEnglish
Article number133788
JournalInternational Journal of Cardiology
Volume441
DOIs
StatePublished - 15 Dec 2025
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Continuous positive airway pressure
  • Obstructive sleep apnea
  • Randomized clinical trial
  • Sham-controlled
  • Systolic blood pressure
  • Type 2 diabetes mellitus

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Effect of continuous positive airway pressure on ventricular remodeling of patients with combined diabetes mellitus and obstructive sleep apnea: a cross-sectional study and follow-on randomized clinical trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this