TY - JOUR
T1 - Effect of body mass index (BMI) on estimation of extracellular volume (ECV) in hemodialysis (HD) patients using segmental and whole body bioimpedance analysis
AU - Carter, Mary
AU - Morris, Alice T.
AU - Zhu, Fansan
AU - Zaluska, Wojciech
AU - Levin, Nathan W.
PY - 2005/4
Y1 - 2005/4
N2 - The aim of the study was to investigate whether body mass index (BMI) influences the estimation of extracellular volume (ECV) in hemodialysis (HD) patients when using segmental bioimpedance analysis (SBIA) compared to wrist-to-ankle bioimpedance analysis (WBIA) during HD with ultrafiltration (UF). Twenty five HD patients (M:F 19:6,) were studied, and further subdivided into two groups of patients, one group with a high BMI (≥25 kg m-2) and the other with a low BMI (<25 kg m-2). Segmental (arm, trunk, leg) and wrist-to-ankle bioimpedance measurements on each patient were performed using a modified Xitron 4000B system (Xitron Technologies, San Diego, CA). No differences in extracellular resistance (RE, ohms) between wrist-to-ankle (RW) and sum of segments (RS) were noted for either the high BMI (489.2 ± 82 ohm versus 491.6 ± 82 ohm, p = ns) or low BMI groups (560.8 ± 77 ohm versus 557.5 ± 75 ohm, p = ns). UF volume (UFV, liters) did not differ significantly between the groups (4.0 ± 0.9 L versus 3.3 ± 1.0 L, p = ns), but change in ECV (ΔECV) differed not only between methods: WBIA versus SBIA in the high BMI group (2.74 ± 1.1 L versus 3.64 ± 1.4 L, p < 0.001) and in the low BMI group (1.86 ± 0.9 L versus 2.91 ± 1.0 L, p < 0.05) but also between the high and lower BMI groups with WBIA (2.74 ± 1.1 L versus 1.86 ± 0.9 L, p < 0.01). However, there was no significant difference in SBIA between BMI groups. This study suggests that the segmental bioimpedance approach may more accurately reflect changes in ECV during HD with UF than whole body impedance measurements.
AB - The aim of the study was to investigate whether body mass index (BMI) influences the estimation of extracellular volume (ECV) in hemodialysis (HD) patients when using segmental bioimpedance analysis (SBIA) compared to wrist-to-ankle bioimpedance analysis (WBIA) during HD with ultrafiltration (UF). Twenty five HD patients (M:F 19:6,) were studied, and further subdivided into two groups of patients, one group with a high BMI (≥25 kg m-2) and the other with a low BMI (<25 kg m-2). Segmental (arm, trunk, leg) and wrist-to-ankle bioimpedance measurements on each patient were performed using a modified Xitron 4000B system (Xitron Technologies, San Diego, CA). No differences in extracellular resistance (RE, ohms) between wrist-to-ankle (RW) and sum of segments (RS) were noted for either the high BMI (489.2 ± 82 ohm versus 491.6 ± 82 ohm, p = ns) or low BMI groups (560.8 ± 77 ohm versus 557.5 ± 75 ohm, p = ns). UF volume (UFV, liters) did not differ significantly between the groups (4.0 ± 0.9 L versus 3.3 ± 1.0 L, p = ns), but change in ECV (ΔECV) differed not only between methods: WBIA versus SBIA in the high BMI group (2.74 ± 1.1 L versus 3.64 ± 1.4 L, p < 0.001) and in the low BMI group (1.86 ± 0.9 L versus 2.91 ± 1.0 L, p < 0.05) but also between the high and lower BMI groups with WBIA (2.74 ± 1.1 L versus 1.86 ± 0.9 L, p < 0.01). However, there was no significant difference in SBIA between BMI groups. This study suggests that the segmental bioimpedance approach may more accurately reflect changes in ECV during HD with UF than whole body impedance measurements.
KW - Body mass index
KW - Hemodialysis
KW - Segmental bioimpedance
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/23044448511
U2 - 10.1088/0967-3334/26/2/009
DO - 10.1088/0967-3334/26/2/009
M3 - Article
C2 - 15798250
AN - SCOPUS:23044448511
SN - 0967-3334
VL - 26
SP - S93-S99
JO - Physiological Measurement
JF - Physiological Measurement
IS - 2
ER -