Early repeat resection for residual glioblastoma: decision-making among an international cohort of neurosurgeons

Anya A. Kim, Antonio Dono, Adham M. Khalafallah, Barbara Nettel-Rueda, George Samandouras, Constantinos G. Hadjipanayis, Debraj Mukherjee, Yoshua Esquenazi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE The importance of extent of resection (EOR) in glioblastoma (GBM) has been thoroughly demonstrated. However, few studies have explored the practices and benefits of early repeat resection (ERR) when residual tumor deemed resectable is unintentionally left after an initial resection, and the survival benefit of ERR is still unknown. Herein, the authors aimed to internationally survey current practices regarding ERR and to analyze differences based on geographic location and practice setting. METHODS The authors distributed a survey to the American Association of Neurological Surgeons and Congress of Neurological Surgeons Tumor Section, Society of British Neurological Surgeons, European Association of Neurosurgical Society, and Latin American Federation of Neurosurgical Societies. Neurosurgeons responded to questions about their training, practice setting, and current ERR practices. They also reported the EOR threshold below which they would pursue ERR and their likelihood of performing ERR using a Likert scale of 1-5 (5 being the most likely) in two sets of 5 cases, the first set for a patient's initial hospitalization and the second for a referred patient who had undergone resection elsewhere. The resection likelihood index for each respondent was calculated as the mean Likert score across all cases. RESULTS Overall, 180 neurosurgeons from 25 countries responded to the survey. Neurosurgeons performed ERRs very rarely in their practices (< 1% of all GBM cases), with an EOR threshold of 80.2% (75%-95%). When presented with 10 cases, the case context (initial hospitalization vs referred patient) did not significantly change the surgeon ERR likelihood, although ERR likelihood did vary significantly on the basis of tumor location (p < 0.0001). Latin American neurosurgeons were more likely to pursue ERR in the provided cases. Neurosurgeons were more likely to pursue ERR when the tumor was MGMT methylated versus unmethylated, with a resection likelihood index of 3.78 and 3.21, respectively (p = 0.004); however, there was no significant difference between IDH mutant and IDH wild-type tumors. CONCLUSIONS Results of this survey reveal current practices regarding ERR, but they also demonstrate the variability in how neurosurgeons approach ERR. Standardized guidelines based on future studies incorporating tumor molecular characteristics are needed to guide neurosurgeons in their decision-making on this complicated issue.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1618-1627
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Neurosurgery
Volume137
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2022

Keywords

  • early repeat resection
  • glioblastoma multiforme
  • international survey
  • neuro-oncology
  • oncology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Early repeat resection for residual glioblastoma: decision-making among an international cohort of neurosurgeons'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this