Early administration of azathioprine vs conventional management of Crohn's disease: A randomized controlled trial

Jacques Cosnes, Anne Bourrier, David Laharie, Stéphane Nahon, Yoram Bouhnik, Franck Carbonnel, Matthieu Allez, Jean Louis Dupas, Jean Marie Reimund, Guillaume Savoye, Pauline Jouet, Jacques Moreau, Jean Yves Mary, Jean Frédéric Colombel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

241 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background & Aims Immunomodulator therapy is effective for patients with Crohn's disease (CD) but has not been shown to affect disease progression, presumably because it is given too late after diagnosis. We compared the efficacy of early treatment (within 6 months after diagnosis) with azathioprine versus conventional management of patients at high risk for disabling disease. Methods We performed an open-label trial of adults with a diagnosis of CD for less than 6 months who were at risk for disabling disease. From July 2005 to November 2010, patients at 24 French centers were randomly assigned to treatment with azathioprine (2.5 mg â̂™ kg-1 â̂™ day-1, n = 65) or conventional management (azathioprine only in cases of corticosteroid dependency, chronic active disease with frequent flares, poor response to corticosteroids, or development of severe perianal disease) (n = 67). The primary end point was the proportion of trimesters spent in corticosteroid-free and anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) - free remission during the first 3 years after inclusion. Results During the 3-year follow-up period, 16 patients in the azathioprine group were switched to mercaptopurine or methotrexate therapy because of intolerance or poor efficacy. Forty-one patients in the conventional management group required immunosuppressant therapy (61%; median time to first prescription, 11 months). In the azathioprine group, a median 67% of trimesters were spent in remission (interquartile range, 11%-85%) compared with 56% in the conventional management group (interquartile range, 29%-73%) (P =.69). Among secondary outcomes, a higher cumulative proportion of patients in the azathioprine group were free of perianal surgery than in the conventional management group (96% ± 3% and 82% ± 6% at month 36, respectively; P =.036). The cumulative proportion of patients free of intestinal surgery and anti-TNF therapy did not differ between groups. Conclusions Based on results from a clinical trial, administration of azathioprine within 6 months of diagnosis of CD was no more effective than conventional management in increasing time of clinical remission. Clinicaltrials.gov, Number NCT00546546.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)758-765.e2
JournalGastroenterology
Volume145
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2013

Keywords

  • Inflammatory Bowel Disease IBD Comparison of Treatment Strategies Drug

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Early administration of azathioprine vs conventional management of Crohn's disease: A randomized controlled trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this