Drug Trials: Optimum Time of Publication

Stephen Moore, Melvin H. Van Worest, David Rosenbaum

Research output: Contribution to journalLetterpeer-review

Abstract

To the Editor: As a clinician primarily interested in new developments in the therapy for myoclonus that might benefit my patients, I was misled by an initial reading of the Van Woert paper (N Engl J Med 296:70, 1977). The authors use the strength of their biologic and biochemical model to excuse their very inadequate clinical trial. They have reported an unblinded, uncontrolled drug trial on 18 patients, using the same neurologists to assess the improvement in myoclonus as were giving the carbidopa and L-5-hydroxytryptophan. They then point to the effects of these drugs on the urine and cerebrospinal-fluid. . .

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1007-1008
Number of pages2
JournalNew England Journal of Medicine
Volume296
Issue number17
DOIs
StatePublished - 28 Apr 1977

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Drug Trials: Optimum Time of Publication'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this