TY - JOUR
T1 - Drain options after vertebral body tethering
AU - Harms Study Group Investigators
AU - Haber, Lawrence
AU - Starring, Hunter
AU - Newcomb, Nicholas
AU - Larson, A. Noelle
AU - Desai, Bhumit
AU - Roybal, Jessica
AU - Fant, Whitney
AU - Milbrandt, Todd
AU - Boeyer, Melanie
AU - Marks, Michelle
AU - Newton, Peter
AU - Samdani, Amer
AU - Miyanji, Firoz
AU - Hoernschemeyer, Dan
AU - Able, Mark
AU - Asghar, John
AU - Bachmann, Keith
AU - Betz, Randy
AU - Md, Aaorn Buckland
AU - Cahill, Patrick
AU - Clements, David
AU - Erickson, Mark
AU - Fletcher, Nicholas
AU - Flynn, Jack
AU - Gabos, Peter
AU - Garg, Sumeet
AU - George, Stephen
AU - Glotzbecker, Michael
AU - Gupta, Munish
AU - Harms, Juergen
AU - Hedequist, Daniel
AU - Hwang, Steven
AU - Jain, Amit
AU - Kelly, Michael
AU - Labelle, Hubert
AU - Lenke, Larry
AU - Lonner, Baron
AU - Mac-Thiong, Jean
AU - Pahys, Josh
AU - Parent, Stefan
AU - Roye, Ben
AU - Shah, Suken
AU - Shufflebarger, Harry
AU - Sponseller, Paul
AU - Sturm, Peter
AU - Sucato, Daniel
AU - Upasani, Salil
AU - Vitale, Michael
AU - Yaszay, Burt
N1 - Funding Information:
Peter Newton MD: during the conduct of the study: grants from Setting Scoliosis Straight Foundation. Outside the submitted work: grants and other from Setting Scoliosis Straight Foundation, other from Rady Children's Specialists, grants, personal fees and non-financial support from DePuy Synthes Spine, grants and other from SRS, grants from EOS imaging, personal fees from Thieme Publishing, grants from NuVasive, other from Electrocore, personal fees from Cubist, other from International Pediatric Orthopedic Think Tank, grants, non-financial support and other from Orthopediatrics, grants, personal fees and non-financial support from Stryker/K2M, grants and non-financial support from Alphatech, grants from Mazor Robotics, personal fees from MiRus, personal fees from Globus Medical, personal fees from Pacira, from Scoliosis Research Society. In addition, Dr. Newton has a patent Anchoring systems and methods for correcting spinal deformities (8540754) with royalties paid to DePuy Synthes Spine, a patent Low profile spinal tethering systems (8123749) licensed to DePuy Spine, Inc., a patent Screw placement guide (7981117) licensed to DePuy Spine, Inc., a patent Compressor for use in minimally invasive surgery (7189244) licensed to DePuy Spine, Inc., and a patent Posterior spinal fixation pending to K2M. Amer Samdani MD: during the conduct of the study: grants from Setting Scoliosis Straight Foundation. Outside the submitted work: personal fees from DePuy Synthes Spine, personal fees from Ethicon, personal fees from Globus Medical, personal fees from Medical Device Business Services, personal fees from Mirus, personal fees from NuVasive, personal fees from Orthofix, personal fees from Stryker, personal fees from Zimmer Biomet. Firoz Miyanji MD: during the Conduct of the Study: grants from Setting Scoliosis Straight Foundation. Outside the Submitted Work: personal fees from Deupy Synthes Spine, personal fees from Stryker Spine, personal fees from Zimmer Biomet. This study was supported in part by grants to the Setting Scoliosis Straight Foundation in support of Harms Study Group research from DePuy Synthes Spine, EOS imaging, Stryker Spine, Medtronic, NuVasive, Zimmer Biomet and the Food and Drug Administration.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Scoliosis Research Society.
PY - 2023/3
Y1 - 2023/3
N2 - Purpose: Since the introduction of vertebral body tethering (VBT) for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), a variety of post-operative chest drainage systems have been utilized. Most surgeons use formal chest tubes with a Pleur-evac, while others use smaller bulb suction drains (e.g., Blake drain). In addition, some centers utilize pleural closure. This multicenter study evaluates whether drain type or pleural closure impact perioperative and 90 day complication rates. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted from three institutions with established VBT programs. All preoperative, perioperative and 90 day postoperative data were analyzed to determine differences in outcomes between three cohorts: standard chest tube (SCT), standard chest tube with pleural closure (SCTPC) and 10 French Bulb drain (BD). Results: 104 patients were identified for the study. 57 SCT, 25 SCTPC and 22 BD. All data are listed in order: SCT, SCTPC, BD. Length of stay (3.7, 4.3, 3.0 days) was less in the BD group (p = 0.009); post-operative drainage (460, 761, 485 cc) was less in the SCT and BD groups (p < 0.001); intra-operative estimated blood loss (EBL) 146, 382, 64 cc was less in the BD group (p < 0.001). No significant difference in number of days (3.2, 3.2, and 2.8 days) drainage was in place, groups (p = 0.311). Complication profile was similar with 2 chest tube reinsertions in the SCT and one hemothorax that resolved spontaneously in BD group. Conclusions: In this series of 104 patients, SCT, SCTPC and BD all had a similar safety profile. All three methods were safe and effective in managing post-operative chest drainage after thoracic VBT. In the series, BD group had significantly shorter LOS than both groups that used chest tubes. Level of evidence: Level III, Retrospective cohort study.
AB - Purpose: Since the introduction of vertebral body tethering (VBT) for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), a variety of post-operative chest drainage systems have been utilized. Most surgeons use formal chest tubes with a Pleur-evac, while others use smaller bulb suction drains (e.g., Blake drain). In addition, some centers utilize pleural closure. This multicenter study evaluates whether drain type or pleural closure impact perioperative and 90 day complication rates. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted from three institutions with established VBT programs. All preoperative, perioperative and 90 day postoperative data were analyzed to determine differences in outcomes between three cohorts: standard chest tube (SCT), standard chest tube with pleural closure (SCTPC) and 10 French Bulb drain (BD). Results: 104 patients were identified for the study. 57 SCT, 25 SCTPC and 22 BD. All data are listed in order: SCT, SCTPC, BD. Length of stay (3.7, 4.3, 3.0 days) was less in the BD group (p = 0.009); post-operative drainage (460, 761, 485 cc) was less in the SCT and BD groups (p < 0.001); intra-operative estimated blood loss (EBL) 146, 382, 64 cc was less in the BD group (p < 0.001). No significant difference in number of days (3.2, 3.2, and 2.8 days) drainage was in place, groups (p = 0.311). Complication profile was similar with 2 chest tube reinsertions in the SCT and one hemothorax that resolved spontaneously in BD group. Conclusions: In this series of 104 patients, SCT, SCTPC and BD all had a similar safety profile. All three methods were safe and effective in managing post-operative chest drainage after thoracic VBT. In the series, BD group had significantly shorter LOS than both groups that used chest tubes. Level of evidence: Level III, Retrospective cohort study.
KW - Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS)
KW - Bulb drain
KW - Pleural closure
KW - Standard chest tube (SCT)
KW - Vertebral body tethering (VBT)
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85139717298&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s43390-022-00595-5
DO - 10.1007/s43390-022-00595-5
M3 - Article
C2 - 36219390
AN - SCOPUS:85139717298
SN - 2212-134X
VL - 11
SP - 367
EP - 372
JO - Spine Deformity
JF - Spine Deformity
IS - 2
ER -