Abstract
Objective: To examine the longitudinal associations between dimensions of COVID-19 pandemic-related moral distress (MD) and moral injury (MI)-related guilt in a large sample of frontline COVID-19 healthcare workers (FHCWs).Methods: Data from a diverse occupational cohort of 786 COVID-19 FHCWs were collected during the initial peak of the COVID-19 pandemic in New York City and again 7 months later. Baseline MD and MI-related guilt at follow-up were assessed in three domains: family-, work-, and infection-related. Social support was evaluated as a potential moderator of associations between MD and MI-related guilt. Results: A total of 66.8% of FHCWs reported moderate-or-greater levels of MI-related guilt, the most prevalent of which were family (59.9%) or work-related (29.4%). MD was robustly predictive of guilt in a domain-specific manner. Further, among FHCWs with high levels of work-related MD, those with greater perceptions of supervisor support were less likely to develop work-related guilt 7 months later. Discussion: MD was found to be highly prevalent in FHCWs during the initial wave of the COVID-19 pandemic and was linked to the development of MI-related guilt over time. Prevention and early intervention efforts to mitigate MD and bolster supervisor support may help reduce risk for MI-related guilt in this population.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 158-161 |
| Number of pages | 4 |
| Journal | General Hospital Psychiatry |
| Volume | 79 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1 Nov 2022 |
Keywords
- COVID-19
- Guilt
- Healthcare workers
- Moral distress
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Downstream consequences of moral distress in COVID-19 frontline healthcare workers: Longitudinal associations with moral injury-related guilt'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver