TY - JOUR
T1 - Dose and fractionation regimen for brachytherapy boost in cervical cancer in the US
AU - Hsieh, Kristin
AU - Bloom, Julie R.
AU - Dickstein, Daniel R.
AU - Hsieh, Celina
AU - Marshall, Deborah
AU - Ghiassi-Nejad, Zahra
AU - Raince, Jagdeep
AU - Lymberis, Stella
AU - Chadha, Manjeet
AU - Gupta, Vishal
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023
PY - 2024/1
Y1 - 2024/1
N2 - Purpose: Curative-intent radiotherapy for locally advanced and select early stage cervical cancer in the US includes external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) with brachytherapy. Although there are guidelines for brachytherapy dose and fractionation regimens, there are limited data on practice patterns. This study aims to evaluate the contemporary utilization of cervical cancer brachytherapy in the US and its association with patient demographics and facility characteristics. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed clinical covariates of cervical cancer patients diagnosed and treated in 2018–2020 with curative-intent radiotherapy from the 2020 National Cancer Database. Associations between patient and institutional factors with the number of brachytherapy fractions were identified with logistic regression. Factors with association (p < 0.10) were then included in a multivariable logistic regression model. All tests were two-sided with significance <0.05 unless specified otherwise. Results: Among the eligible 2517 patients, 97.3% received HDR or LDR and is further analyzed. More patients received HDR than LDR brachytherapy (98.9% vs 1.1%) and intracavitary than interstitial brachytherapy (86.4% vs 13.6%). The most common number of HDR fractions prescribed were 5 (51.0%), 4 (32.9%), and 3 (8.6%). After adjusting for the other variables in the model, ethnicity, private insurance status, overall insurance status, and facility type were the only factors that were significantly associated with the number of brachytherapy factions (p < 0.0001, p = 0.028, p = 0.001, and p < 0.0001, respectively, n = 2184). Conclusions: In the US, various HDR brachytherapy regimens are utilized depending on patient and institutional factors. Future research may optimize cervical cancer brachytherapy by correlating specific dose and fractionation regimens with patient outcomes.
AB - Purpose: Curative-intent radiotherapy for locally advanced and select early stage cervical cancer in the US includes external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) with brachytherapy. Although there are guidelines for brachytherapy dose and fractionation regimens, there are limited data on practice patterns. This study aims to evaluate the contemporary utilization of cervical cancer brachytherapy in the US and its association with patient demographics and facility characteristics. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed clinical covariates of cervical cancer patients diagnosed and treated in 2018–2020 with curative-intent radiotherapy from the 2020 National Cancer Database. Associations between patient and institutional factors with the number of brachytherapy fractions were identified with logistic regression. Factors with association (p < 0.10) were then included in a multivariable logistic regression model. All tests were two-sided with significance <0.05 unless specified otherwise. Results: Among the eligible 2517 patients, 97.3% received HDR or LDR and is further analyzed. More patients received HDR than LDR brachytherapy (98.9% vs 1.1%) and intracavitary than interstitial brachytherapy (86.4% vs 13.6%). The most common number of HDR fractions prescribed were 5 (51.0%), 4 (32.9%), and 3 (8.6%). After adjusting for the other variables in the model, ethnicity, private insurance status, overall insurance status, and facility type were the only factors that were significantly associated with the number of brachytherapy factions (p < 0.0001, p = 0.028, p = 0.001, and p < 0.0001, respectively, n = 2184). Conclusions: In the US, various HDR brachytherapy regimens are utilized depending on patient and institutional factors. Future research may optimize cervical cancer brachytherapy by correlating specific dose and fractionation regimens with patient outcomes.
KW - Cervical cancer
KW - High dose rate (HDR)
KW - Interstitial brachytherapy
KW - Intracavitary brachytherapy
KW - Low dose rate (LDR)
KW - Radiotherapy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85178605525&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.11.014
DO - 10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.11.014
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85178605525
SN - 0090-8258
VL - 180
SP - 55
EP - 62
JO - Gynecologic Oncology
JF - Gynecologic Oncology
ER -