TY - JOUR
T1 - Donor side effects experienced under minimal controlled ovarian stimulation with in vitro maturation vs. conventional controlled ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization treatment
AU - Marchante, Maria
AU - Barrachina, Ferran
AU - Piechota, Sabrina
AU - Fernandez-González, Marta
AU - Giovannini, Alexa
AU - Smith, Trozalla
AU - Kats, Simone
AU - Paulsen, Bruna
AU - González, Eva
AU - Calvente, Virginia
AU - Silvan, Ana
AU - Abittan, Baruch
AU - Klein, Joshua
AU - Klatsky, Peter
AU - Ordonez, Daniel
AU - Kramme, Christian C.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Authors
PY - 2024/8
Y1 - 2024/8
N2 - Objective: To evaluate oocyte retrieval experiences and side effects under minimally controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) treatment for in vitro maturation (IVM) of oocytes compared with conventional COS treatment. Design: A retrospective survey study. Setting: Clinical in vitro fertilization treatment center. Patient(s): Data were collected from subjects undergoing minimal COS treatment (n = 110; 600–800 IU follicle-stimulating hormone) for IVM of oocytes and conventional COS treatment for egg donation (n = 48; 1,800–2,600 IU follicle-stimulating hormone) from April 2022 to November 2023. Intervention(s): Minimal and conventional COS treatments. Main Outcome Measure(s): The most common side effects experienced during ovarian stimulation and after oocyte pick-up, satisfaction level, and the likelihood of recommending or repeating minimal or conventional COS. Statistical analysis included Mann-Whitney U test and χ2 tests, with a significance level. Result(s): During minimal COS treatment, most subjects did not experience breast swelling (86%), pelvic or abdominal pain (76%), nausea or vomiting (96%), and bleeding (96%). After oocyte pick-up, the majority (75%) reported no pelvic or abdominal pain. The most common side effect was abdominal swelling (52%). Compared with conventional COS cycles, minimal COS subjects reported significantly less postretrieval pain, with 33% experiencing no pain (vs. 6%) and with a reduced severe level of pain (5% vs. 19%), leading to fewer subjects requiring pain medication (25% vs. 54%). Additionally, 85% of women were very satisfied with minimal stimulation treatment and would recommend or repeat the treatment. Conclusion(s): Reducing the hormonal dose for ovarian stimulation has a beneficial effect on subjects, suggesting the combination of minimal COS treatment with IVM techniques is a well-tolerated alternative for women who cannot or do not wish to undergo conventionally controlled ovarian hyperstimulation treatment.
AB - Objective: To evaluate oocyte retrieval experiences and side effects under minimally controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) treatment for in vitro maturation (IVM) of oocytes compared with conventional COS treatment. Design: A retrospective survey study. Setting: Clinical in vitro fertilization treatment center. Patient(s): Data were collected from subjects undergoing minimal COS treatment (n = 110; 600–800 IU follicle-stimulating hormone) for IVM of oocytes and conventional COS treatment for egg donation (n = 48; 1,800–2,600 IU follicle-stimulating hormone) from April 2022 to November 2023. Intervention(s): Minimal and conventional COS treatments. Main Outcome Measure(s): The most common side effects experienced during ovarian stimulation and after oocyte pick-up, satisfaction level, and the likelihood of recommending or repeating minimal or conventional COS. Statistical analysis included Mann-Whitney U test and χ2 tests, with a significance level. Result(s): During minimal COS treatment, most subjects did not experience breast swelling (86%), pelvic or abdominal pain (76%), nausea or vomiting (96%), and bleeding (96%). After oocyte pick-up, the majority (75%) reported no pelvic or abdominal pain. The most common side effect was abdominal swelling (52%). Compared with conventional COS cycles, minimal COS subjects reported significantly less postretrieval pain, with 33% experiencing no pain (vs. 6%) and with a reduced severe level of pain (5% vs. 19%), leading to fewer subjects requiring pain medication (25% vs. 54%). Additionally, 85% of women were very satisfied with minimal stimulation treatment and would recommend or repeat the treatment. Conclusion(s): Reducing the hormonal dose for ovarian stimulation has a beneficial effect on subjects, suggesting the combination of minimal COS treatment with IVM techniques is a well-tolerated alternative for women who cannot or do not wish to undergo conventionally controlled ovarian hyperstimulation treatment.
KW - In vitro fertilization
KW - hormonal injections
KW - minimal ovarian stimulation
KW - side effects
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85196748495
U2 - 10.1016/j.xfss.2024.05.002
DO - 10.1016/j.xfss.2024.05.002
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85196748495
SN - 2666-335X
VL - 5
SP - 242
EP - 251
JO - F and S Science
JF - F and S Science
IS - 3
ER -