TY - JOUR
T1 - Does type 2 diabetes mellitus promote intervertebral disc degeneration?
AU - Fabiane, Stella Maris
AU - Ward, Kirsten J.
AU - Iatridis, James C.
AU - Williams, Frances M.K.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016, The Author(s).
PY - 2016/9/1
Y1 - 2016/9/1
N2 - Purpose: LDD is an important cause of low back pain. Many people believe there is an adverse influence of type 2 diabetes (T2D) on lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration (LDD). We examined a population sample for epidemiological evidence of association. Methods: Twin volunteers from the TwinsUK cohort having spine magnetic resonance (MR) scans coded for LDD and information about T2D were investigated in two ways. First, as a population sample and second as a cotwin case control study in twin pairs discordant for T2D. Other risk factors for LDD considered were age, body-mass index (BMI), smoking, and alcohol. Results: In 956 twin volunteers T2D had a prevalence of 6.6 %. LDD score was higher in T2D twins (14.9 vs 13.1 p = 0.04) but was not an independent risk factor if the influence of age and BMI were included in the model. Discordant twin analysis (n = 33 pairs) showed no significant difference in LDD between twins having T2D and their unaffected cotwins. Conclusions: Twins having T2D did manifest higher LDD scores but the effect was abrogated once BMI was included in multivariable analysis, showing it is not an independent risk factor for LDD. The population study had 80 % power at 0.1 significance level to detect a difference of 1.8 in LDD score (range of 0–60), so if there is an effect of T2D on LDD, it is likely to be small.
AB - Purpose: LDD is an important cause of low back pain. Many people believe there is an adverse influence of type 2 diabetes (T2D) on lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration (LDD). We examined a population sample for epidemiological evidence of association. Methods: Twin volunteers from the TwinsUK cohort having spine magnetic resonance (MR) scans coded for LDD and information about T2D were investigated in two ways. First, as a population sample and second as a cotwin case control study in twin pairs discordant for T2D. Other risk factors for LDD considered were age, body-mass index (BMI), smoking, and alcohol. Results: In 956 twin volunteers T2D had a prevalence of 6.6 %. LDD score was higher in T2D twins (14.9 vs 13.1 p = 0.04) but was not an independent risk factor if the influence of age and BMI were included in the model. Discordant twin analysis (n = 33 pairs) showed no significant difference in LDD between twins having T2D and their unaffected cotwins. Conclusions: Twins having T2D did manifest higher LDD scores but the effect was abrogated once BMI was included in multivariable analysis, showing it is not an independent risk factor for LDD. The population study had 80 % power at 0.1 significance level to detect a difference of 1.8 in LDD score (range of 0–60), so if there is an effect of T2D on LDD, it is likely to be small.
KW - Lumbar disc disease
KW - Lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration
KW - Type 2 diabetes
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84987814187&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00586-016-4612-3
DO - 10.1007/s00586-016-4612-3
M3 - Article
C2 - 27272275
AN - SCOPUS:84987814187
SN - 0940-6719
VL - 25
SP - 2716
EP - 2720
JO - European Spine Journal
JF - European Spine Journal
IS - 9
ER -