Does the broad categories for the diagnosis of eating disorders (BCD-ED) scheme reduce the frequency of eating disorder not otherwise specified?

Robyn Sysko, B. Timothy Walsh

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

20 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective: This study evaluated whether the Broad Categories for the Diagnosis of Eating Disorders (BCD-ED) proposal (Walsh and Sysko, Int J Eat Disord, 42, 754-764, 2009) reduces the number of individuals who receive a DSM-IV eating disorder not otherwise specified (EDNOS) diagnosis. Method: Individuals calling a tertiary care facility completed a brief telephone interview and were classified into a DSM-IV eating disorder category (anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, EDNOS). Subsequently, the proposed DSM-5 criteria for eating disorders and the BCD-ED scheme were also applied. Results: A total of 247 individuals with telephone interview data met criteria for an eating disorder, including 97 (39.3%) with an EDNOS. Of patients with an EDNOS diagnosis, 97.6% were reclassified using the BCD-ED scheme. Discussion: The BCD-ED scheme has the potential to virtually eliminate the use of DSM-IV EDNOS; however, additional data are needed to document its validity and clinical utility.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)625-629
Number of pages5
JournalInternational Journal of Eating Disorders
Volume44
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2011
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • DSM-5
  • diagnosis
  • eating disorder not otherwise specified

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Does the broad categories for the diagnosis of eating disorders (BCD-ED) scheme reduce the frequency of eating disorder not otherwise specified?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this